He thinks this is something that Congress needs to create as legislation rather than a executive order by a man who can't get a majority through the House and Senate.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: He thinks this is something that Congress needs to create as legislation rather than a executive order by a man who can't get a majority through the House and Senate.
Did the judge write that last part in his opinion? If not, please don't attribute thoughts to a judge that you yourself think.
I really doesn't matter an iota why I think a judge overturned something. Also, one judge overturning something doesn't matter much, either.
For procedural reasons that Judge Hanen spelled out in his latest opinion, his ruling will not immediately affect current DACA recipients, although it will bar approval of new applications. In addition, as Judge Hanen remarked, the government will have an opportunity to put DACA on a firmer legal footing through a new regulation that is currently in the drafting stage.
But back to my main point. Let's let our legislators figure out DACA, not the executive nor judicial branch. Executive orders are being abused. If you can't get it through the House and Senate, it is probably unpopular and America doesn't want it.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Wayne Harrison wrote: Like The Emancipation Proclamation, you mean? Or Nixon's pardon?
The Emancipation Proclamation could have easily passed the legislature. The Amendment that outlawed slavery passed. (The legislature was dominated by Republicans.) The slave owning Democrat politicians didn't show up in DC. Just like Texas Democrats.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
I'm sorry...that sector does NOT see the comparison. (and has indicated that the OTHER sector is bringing this country to it's knees. TOTAL disconnect.