Supply Chain Issues?

Blazer Bob wrote: You are only scoring points in your echo chamber which is getting smaller and smaller. More and more people are laughing at New Speak.

Why don't you take a stab at defending administration policies. Supply chain issues would be a good one for this thread.

I will call out homophobia, misogyny, and racism wherever and whenever I see it.

Rick wrote: At some point you have to stop getting so upset about how we talk about these individuals that nobody voted for and start either defending their performances or critiquing them.

At some point, you need to accept that people have different beliefs and lifestyles from you. Making fun of them only shows your fear, intolerance, and bigotry.

koobookie wrote:

Rick wrote: At some point you have to stop getting so upset about how we talk about these individuals that nobody voted for and start either defending their performances or critiquing them.

At some point, you need to accept that people have different beliefs and lifestyles from you. Making fun of them only shows your fear, intolerance, and bigotry.

You are making a false claim of bigotry. Never once did I condemn his sexual orientation, I condemned his long absence from a very important job every one of us is paying for. There has never been a time in my lifetime where his job has been more important than now, and we are all supposed to believe that he is needed more at home than he is needed by 340 million Americans?

Rick wrote: You are making a false claim of bigotry. Never once did I condemn his sexual orientation, I condemned his long absence from a very important job every one of us is paying for.

You made fun of his sexual orientation.

You're right Bob, non-prostate owners have a much easier time recovering than these brave birthing people. My bad.

WHOA BABY...gotta cha'. Obvious Freudian slips passing the lips....TELL US WHAT YOU REALLY THINK?

koobookie wrote:

Blazer Bob wrote: You are only scoring points in your echo chamber which is getting smaller and smaller. More and more people are laughing at New Speak.

Why don't you take a stab at defending administration policies. Supply chain issues would be a good one for this thread.

I will call out homophobia, misogyny, and racism wherever and whenever I see it.

Yes but like CNN you sjw's see it where it does not exist then make it up. Remember the Covington face crime?

You need homophobia, misogyny, and racism etc because that is all you have. Oh yea and Jan. 6.

"Do you know for a fact that he was not involved in his department while on leave?"

Another straw man to try and deflect from the failure of his department. It matters not if failed because he was not at the helm or if it failed because he was involved and made bad decisions.

No, Fred made an assertion that Pete was not available during his leave. I asked Fred if he knew for a fact that his assumption was true.

You need homophobia, misogyny, and racism etc because that is all you have. Oh yea and Jan. 6.

You can believe that erroneous world view, if it gives you comfort. If you think our world does not have any of those issues, then you are wrong.

Hmmm. Had to look up "S J W."

Social justice warrior (SJW) is a pejorative term used for an individual who promotes socially progressive, left-wing and liberal views, including feminism, civil rights, gay and transgender rights, identity politics and multiculturalism. The accusation that somebody is an SJW carries implications that they are pursuing personal validation rather than any deep-seated conviction, and engaging in disingenuous arguments.

The phrase originated in the late 20th century as a neutral or positive term for people engaged in social justice activism. In 2011, when the term first appeared on Twitter, it changed from a primarily positive term to an overwhelmingly negative one. During the Gamergate controversy, the term was adopted by what would become the alt-right, and the negative connotations gained increased usage which overshadowed its origins.

koobookie wrote:

Rick wrote: You are making a false claim of bigotry. Never once did I condemn his sexual orientation, I condemned his long absence from a very important job every one of us is paying for.

You made fun of his sexual orientation.

You're right Bob, non-prostate owners have a much easier time recovering than these brave birthing people. My bad.

No koobookie, a non-prostate owner would be a woman. Pete obviously has a prostate. We are using the ridiculous new woke terminology because it’s so stupid that it’s funny, and it comes from the left 100%.

Rick wrote: No koobookie, a non-prostate owner would be a woman. Pete obviously has a prostate. We are using the ridiculous new woke terminology because it’s so stupid that it’s funny, and it comes from the left 100%.

You made fun of a homosexual couple. It's sad to see someone justify their prejudices.