Oh yeah, The Guardian can be considered "news"--NOT! When will people learn that propaganda that supports their biases isn't news? "The truth about lies is that people believe them because they WANT to, not because they HAVE to". Or put another way "How sad it must be--believing that scientists, scholars, historians, economists and journalists have devoted their entire lives to deceiving you, while a reality TV star with decades of fraud and exhaustively documented lying is your only beacon of truth and honesty." Get my point?
Carrie wrote: Oh yeah, The Guardian can be considered "news"--NOT! When will people learn that propaganda that supports their biases isn't news? "The truth about lies is that people believe them because they WANT to, not because they HAVE to". Or put another way "How sad it must be--believing that scientists, scholars, historians, economists and journalists have devoted their entire lives to deceiving you, while a reality TV star with decades of fraud and exhaustively documented lying is your only beacon of truth and honesty." Get my point?
POINT......The Guardian and The Washington Post shared the 2014 Pulitzer Prize for public service reporting for their coverage of the NSA's and GCHQ's worldwide electronic surveillance program and the document leaks by whistleblower Edward Snowden.[294]
WHAT I BELIEVE IN IS HISTORY......the fourth turning is HISTORICALLY based....JMO perhaps the tirade
u just typed is overlooking a broader view.....I am NOT some right wing wacko,nor am I a "woke" left wing
loser. I am realistic in seeing the fubared, seriously flawed STRUCTURE.....this piece brings that forward
in a succinct way.......the status quo is a NOT stable.....when stability is absent WHAT HAPPENS????
The press also wants you to click on that article so they will constantly throw out crazy theories to attract your attention. You even helped them by forwarding that article to us.
It is like what SC said years ago about Climate Change. The press emphasizes the wild ends of the analysis which is very unlikely.
Sure, there is a chance the US could have a civil war, but it is highly unlikely. What would be the battle lines? Rural versus urban? Red states versus blue states? Or red counties versus blue?
I know I have no desire to spend the next three years in a trench overlooking 285. Do you?
Most Americans are more concerned about their work and families than politics. Look how many are now unaffiliated to either major party.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote: The press also wants you to click on that article so they will constantly throw out crazy theories to attract your attention. You even helped them by forwarding that article to us.
It is like what SC said years ago about Climate Change. The press emphasizes the wild ends of the analysis which is very unlikely. Sure, there is a chance the US could have a civil war, but it is highly unlikely. What would be the battle lines? Rural versus urban? Red states versus blue states? Or red counties versus blue?
I know I have no desire to spend the next three years in a trench overlooking 285. Do you?
Most Americans are more concerned about their work and families than politics. Look how many are now unaffiliated to either major party.
FROM THE BROOKING INSTITUTE.....
here's your answer....oh, by the way I am an INDEPENDENT, and it is JMO
LISTEN AND LISTEN WELL.....30 YEARS OF STUDYING CIVIL WAR SCENARIOS....SO CARRIE,do u know what a leaderless resistance means???.......PERHAPS, u might want to do some research, because we r NOW IN A GREY AREA THAT HAS NEVER BEEN EXPERIENCED IN THIS COUNTRY...EVER...the depth of knowledge,from SOME SECTORS is woefully lacking.....jmo ,but the above podcast is VERY TELLING.....
As soon as I read "January 6th" my eyes instantly rolled and then I had to chuckle. Too bad there's so many sheep in this country who still believe that was some sort of
"insurrection"... unarmed and uncoordinated. If Trump had won there would have been a much bigger attack on the capital and cities across the country would have been burning for weeks. If these brain dead journalists think that was some sort of prelude to a civil war, they really need to seek mental health care.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
So if America is going to have a civil war, what are you doing to prepare? Have you stocked up on canned goods? Built a bunker? Which side will you join? Learned first aid and small unit military tactics?
A civil war like Syria is fighting would screw over the rich and powerful so they will not let it happen.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
I think that is what the BRITISH thought,when the original "tea party" was in full send. NEVER under estimate a "mass mindset' with a singular objective.....to throw off the chains that bind....and be autonomous .
FredHayek wrote: So if America is going to have a civil war, what are you doing to prepare? Have you stocked up on canned goods? Built a bunker? Which side will you join? Learned first aid and small unit military tactics?
A civil war like Syria is fighting would screw over the rich and powerful so they will not let it happen.
