Twitter Launches Poison Pill To Prevent Musk Sale.

The board would literally rather burn down the company and screw shareholders than sell to an African-American. Inexcusable! I hope the shareholders sue the board.

It's the absolute responsibility of the board to do what is best for the shareholders so I would be lawsuits, but of course the bard will have the power of the our freedom hating DOJ as backup.

Communists must censor the population but clueless Americans (like most of our 'journalists') think this new censorship is somehow good for our republic.

www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/0...twitter-poison-pill/

IF U would like FULL DISCLOSURE....HERE'S THE 411

Before getting into the WaPo article, perhaps you would like to explain what a 411 is.

Now to the article, the authors neglect to point out that the Board of Directors has a fiduciary responsibility to the shareholders of Twitter. Nowhere in the article do they note that no other bidders have come forth and made an offer, let alone one greater that the Musk offer. If none comes forth and it looks unlikely that the Saudi prince will make an offer then the BoD has violated its fiduciary responsibility. Let the shareholder lawsuits commence.
I would love to see the Saudi make an offer, it would be rich to see Twitter owned by someone from that repressive country,

As said in the cinema, Please pass the popcorn while we watch the story unfold.

Have to love when HA uses a Washington Post source. More embarrassing? To clue her in, the Washington Post is owned by the oligarch Jeff Bezos. He bought the influential paper to squash anti-Amazon stories. And now he has them writing anti-Musk articles. (Musk is his main opponent in the space industry.)


Happy to find out you were duped by corporate propaganda?

It would be like GM buying the NY Times to trash Toyota cars .

For Ramage.......

www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/411#examples

It's ALL GOOD.......a multitude of sources will probably state it in a similar manner....gathering information
is imperative,when u want to see THE TOTAL PICTURE......

ANOTHER DIVERSION......is a delicious side dish,debating who is worse...Biden or Trump was becoming
stale...like 3 week old bread.


www.forbes.com/sites/alanohnsman/2022/04...ent/?sh=33074b2a4370

homeagain wrote: It's ALL GOOD.......a multitude of sources will probably state it in a similar manner....gathering information
is imperative,when u want to see THE TOTAL PICTURE......

Which of your trusted sources includes the point ramage made about the board of directors having a duty to serve shareholders instead of their own interests in keeping twitter as-is and not a platform for free speech?

Musk isn't doing this for the money because Twitter is not making enough money to justify his offer. Musk is the best option and these idiots seem to be willing to hurt stockholders to preserve their censorship norms.

Per the WSJ, Apollo Global, a leader in taking companies private, is looking at supporting Musk's bid.

And yesterday, interviews with Jack Dorsey, former CEO of Twitter, really makes it look like that board needs to be replaced. They own very little stock of TWTR and don't appear to have any expertise in the industry. Real board members are chosen for their expertise and experience.