So they can vote in the primary and influence the Republican primary. Do you think this is ethical? In the article, Democrats on the Western Slope are voting against Representative Boebert, but election experts doubt the more moderate Republican in her primary has a chance to win.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
To me that just sounds like Democrats are afraid of her for some reason. I want the loons like AOC to be elected because I believe they hurt the Democrat party. The crazier they look, the more voters they lose from normal people with common sense. I don't think Bobert is crazy, but if she keeps Democrats up at night, then she's an asset in my book.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
IT WAS VOTED ON AND MADE INTO LAW........what is the problem? U r free to research ANY. candidate and select the one that has the most intelligence (R or D)....and I DID JUST THAT. I voted R.,as an indy.
homeagain wrote: IT WAS VOTED ON AND MADE INTO LAW........what is the problem? U r free to research ANY. candidate and select the one that has the most intelligence (R or D)....and I DID JUST THAT. I voted R.,as an indy.
LOL, there are many things that are voted on and made into law that aren't ethical.
I think this is really Democrats wanting to have influence in a deep Red district. Surprised Aspen didn't make a special appeal to be gerrymandered into Boulder's congressional district.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
