Oh No! More Democrat Corruption

koobookie wrote: Am I to assume, Rick, that Trump making 7.8 million dollars by funneling money from other countries into his businesses is acceptable to you?

Source please.

It really gets old when every topic must be flipped to be an anti-Trump thread. As a reminder, this thread is about a corrupt Democrat that is going after Trump. Try to defend this woman, I dare you.

Source? It's all over the lame stream media.

www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/trump-...ent-repor-rcna132276

Former President Donald Trump received at least $7.8 million in payments from foreign governments during two of his four years in the White House, according to a report released Thursday by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee.

Twenty foreign governments made the payments to Trump's businesses during the two-year period that the committee was able to review. The information in the report was first reported by The New York Times and CNN.

www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2024-...ice-he-d-do-it-again

Donald Trump and his businesses hauled in at least $7.8 million from foreign governments and officials of 20 countries during his presidency. The bulk of that came from China, but Saudi Arabia, Qatar and others also chipped in relatively modest amounts, according to a new report from Democrats on the House Oversight Committee.

Trump has never been as wealthy as he has claimed, but he’s still a rich man, and $7.8 million may not mean as much to him as it would to an average wage earner. It’s also an election year, and in an era of fractious and fractured politics it would be convenient to dismiss the committee’s report as a partisan Democratic hit job.

www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-business-...y-report-2024-01-04/

Businesses tied to Republican former U.S. President Donald Trump received at least $7.8 million in foreign payments from 20 countries during his four years in the White House, Democratic congressional investigators said Thursday.
U.S. House of Representatives Oversight Committee Democrats said the payments detailed in the 156-page report are likely a fraction of the foreign payments made to Trump and his family during his 2017-2021 administration.

What Reuters and Bloomberg and NBC left out out

"Eric Trump, the former president’s second son, who runs the family business with his brother, responded to Raskin’s claims with a scathing letter Wednesday, pointing out that most of the foreign money received by The Trump Organization during his father’s presidency was rent payments for a 20-year commercial-office lease that began in 2008 — “more than eight years prior to President Trump taking office.”

Apart from that, Eric says he signed a check every year to the US Treasury donating 100% of estimated profits from “foreign patronage” at their hotels.

“We donated every dollar of foreign profit,” he told The Post, adding that his father was “the first president to donate his salary while in office to various federal agencies.”

nypost.com/2024/01/17/opinion/firing-bac...l-subpoena-drags-on/

Thanks ramage, you beat me to it.

Does Brittany need to resign her congressional seat?

Of course not. Fred. Why doses Robert Menendez still have a job? That guy should be rotting in prison, but at least we got rid of the George Santos who was removed for lying . It's mind boggling how different people are treated based on what party they are part of.

I'm not taking the word of anyone from that organization. Remember, the Trump family spent money from a children's cancer charity for their own personal use. They were found guilty and fined $2,000,000.

koobookie wrote: I'm not taking the word of anyone from that organization.

Liberal Channel 9 news refuses to report on Brittany giving her husband a 180K political job, so K can ignore any stories that show her party members in a bad light.

Awful convenient to only read the "progressive" press.

FredHayek wrote: Liberal Channel 9 news refuses to report on Brittany giving her husband a 180K political job, so K can ignore any stories that show her party members in a bad light.

Awful convenient to only read the "progressive" press.

Perhaps it's because only "conservative" press thinks it's worthy of a story?