She has been educated in our broken system and was never taught how important the RIGHT of free speech is. If you ban "hate speech", you can then define hate to be whatever you want, depending on who may be offended. I could easily show many examples of Biden spewing hate speech on national TV when he's painted half the voters with an extremist brush. According to him, you're a dangerous extremist if you choose Trump over him. (or "you ain't black")
On our current course, we will have to put our phones in silent boxes so potential "hate speech" can't be monitored by big brother.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
I'm not as naive as the people who vote for people who were ok with social media giants silencing true information and political candidates they don't like.
It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy
homeagain wrote: On our current course, we will have to put our phones in silent boxes so potential "hate speech" can't be monitored by big brother. per Rick
JUST a little bit naive,dude.....Big brother is missing NOTHING....if A TIDBIT OF INTEL//INFO is wanted,they got it.
The Federal government used cell phone data to arrest right wing political prisoners on January 6th.
The Atlanta prosecutor who was caught lying about her relationship with a well paid boyfriend. The lies were caught by tracking his cell phone. Now Atlanta Democrats have decided cell phone data is too vague to be used in a court of law. More evidence of a double standard.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.