What a great self-own, Fred. "Set the bar low enough..." when your boy has already been rated in the bottom three worst presidents by presidential historians. Truly weird.
and then there's his debate performance vs Harris. Tell me again how the bar was set low?
koobookie wrote: What a great self-own, Fred. "Set the bar low enough..." when your boy has already been rated in the bottom three worst presidents by presidential historians. Truly weird.
and then there's his debate performance vs Harris. Tell me again how the bar was set low?
LOL. Biden has been senile the majority of his administration. The bar is literally on the floor right now. Record high deficit, record inflation during the majority of his term, and now the ghost administration of Joe is preparing to leave the nation in a recession.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
How could you doubt George Clooney? Or your own eyes when Joe was wandering around around other foreign leaders while they smirked and tried to get him back on track. #embarrassing
koobookie wrote: Oh, so now you're a doctor and can diagnose that he's senile. Sure.
Do you remember what Trump left this administration?
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Kamala has to win now! She has the support of her sorority sisters!
By the way, one of the debate moderators this week is a sorority sister of Harris. I will let you decide which one and could she still be objective.
(She wasn't.)
She should have recused herself.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
FredHayek wrote:
LOL. Biden has been senile the majority of his administration. The bar is literally on the floor right now. Record high deficit, record inflation during the majority of his term, and now the ghost administration of Joe is preparing to leave the nation in a recession.
Kamala has to win now! She has the support of her sorority sisters!
By the way, one of the debate moderators this week is a sorority sister of Harris. I will let you decide which one and could she still be objective.
(She wasn't.)
She should have recused herself.[/quote]
THAT is so- hyper hypocritical ......MUCH of the SCOTUS have not recused themselves from issues that were OBVIOUS conflict of interest....a well appointed panel BY TRUMP. .....not only weird,but WRONG.
Well, Fred, and other conservatives here, operate under the belief that if you're a democrat, you cannot set aside your political beliefs and be objective.
In addition, f any family member is a democrat, you can't be objective, i.e., in ruling as a judge.
If you were in the same sorority as a current political candidate, you can't be objective, even if you weren't at the same university or sorority house in the same decade.
But if you're a republican, it's easy and natural to be objective.
If you're republican, it's easy to see the "truth," even though conservative media has been shown to be bought and paid for by Russia.
