the king is back pedaling that statement....DEBATE, he decided his bullshit was a BIG deficit and NOW realizes that he will be debating A PROSECUTOR., (big difference from BIDEN).....GAME PLAN A OUT THE WINDOW,NOW WATCH HIM TRY TO WEASEL OUT OF THIS WICKED
WRECK.
You should read "The Art of the Deal. By declining a 2nd debate, he can renegotiate the upcoming debate. Why not try for better moderators? Or have the debate on a more sympathetic network?
Trump is a conflicting mass of emotions, but he has clearly has ego.
Do you honestly believe he thinks Kamala can beat him straight up? Of course not. I know this is the media talking point for the week, but don't believe.
Donald wasn't scared of President Biden. He isn't scared of Kamala Harris.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Why should Trump always play by leftist rules? Why are the terms always dictated by the Democrats, including who sponsors the debate? Do you think Harris or any Democrat would abide by Trump's terms? Hell no. The only chance Harris has in a debate against Trump is if it's on a leftist network with leftist moderators and she will have to be given the questions ahead of time so someone smarter than her can give her the best answers.
[quote="Rick" post=406335]Why should Trump always play by leftist rules? Why are the terms always dictated by the Democrats, including who sponsors the debate? Do you think Harris or any Democrat would abide by Trump's terms? Hell no. The only chance Harris has in a debate against Trump is if it's on a leftist network with leftist moderators and she will have to be given the questions ahead of time so someone smarter than her can give her the best answers.
Besides, Harris is not the candidate yet.[/quote]
EXCUSE ME....he was the one stating ANYTIME,ANY WHERE.....YOUR ARGUMENT HOLDS NO WATER.,any time any where is just EXACTLY THAT....NOPE, he back pedaled...u just can't admit that.
sorry, your lack of integrity is showing.
Do you really need a debate to tell you how Trump or Kamala will govern?
Trump has four years in office you can look at.
Kamala? When she was in the US Senate, she was the most liberal senator, even more so than Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren. If you want a super liberal president, she is your choice.
As VP, she voted for the most expensive budget in American history.,(VP is the tie breaker.)
So once again, why do we need another ninety minute debate? These are established politicians. Not political newcomers.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Do you really need a debate to tell you how Trump or Kamala will govern?
Trump has four years in office you can look at.
Kamala? When she was in the US Senate, she was the most liberal senator, even more so than Bernie Sanders or Elizabeth Warren. If you want a super liberal president, she is your choice.
As VP, she voted for the most expensive budget in American history.,(VP is the tie breaker.)
So once again, why do we need another ninety minute debate? These are established politicians. Not political newcomers.
because BULLSHIT DOES NOT cut it,when u r up against a lawyer, whose job is to cut thru the crap and find the truth...she did that in spades with K at the confirmation hearing.......refresh your memory cells.
homeagain wrote: [quote="Rick" post=406335]Why should Trump always play by leftist rules? Why are the terms always dictated by the Democrats, including who sponsors the debate? Do you think Harris or any Democrat would abide by Trump's terms? Hell no. The only chance Harris has in a debate against Trump is if it's on a leftist network with leftist moderators and she will have to be given the questions ahead of time so someone smarter than her can give her the best answers.
Besides, Harris is not the candidate yet.
EXCUSE ME....he was the one stating ANYTIME,ANY WHERE.....YOUR ARGUMENT HOLDS NO WATER.,any time any where is just EXACTLY THAT....NOPE, he back pedaled...u just can't admit that.
sorry, your lack of integrity is showing.[/quote]
Attacking Rick's integrity just shows how far gone you really are.
homeagain wrote: [quote="Rick" post=406335]Why should Trump always play by leftist rules? Why are the terms always dictated by the Democrats, including who sponsors the debate? Do you think Harris or any Democrat would abide by Trump's terms? Hell no. The only chance Harris has in a debate against Trump is if it's on a leftist network with leftist moderators and she will have to be given the questions ahead of time so someone smarter than her can give her the best answers.
Besides, Harris is not the candidate yet.
EXCUSE ME....he was the one stating ANYTIME,ANY WHERE.....YOUR ARGUMENT HOLDS NO WATER.,any time any where is just EXACTLY THAT....NOPE, he back pedaled...u just can't admit that.
sorry, your lack of integrity is showing.[/quote] Trump made that agreement with Biden, not Harris. Now it’s Trumps turn to set the terms. He will filet that moron like a fish because she has done absolutely nothing as VP. She was a horrible prosecutor and her home state didn’t want her to be president. This is one of those “lipstick on a pig” analogies your too dumb confirmed to understand. Like I said before, I know much more about Kamala than you do because your media didn’t show you all her embarrassing moments… but I’ve seen them all.
Just like with Biden, you’ve been kept in the dark.
WE SHALL WAIT AND WATCH......the women who will want THEIR bodies back will revolt....the YOUNG
females will observe Beyonce and Swift,one gesture from them will unleash a tsunami of revolt.....do not underestimate the gravity of R V W......it is at your peril. JMO
FOR BB....Rick deviated from the topic ANYTIME, ANY WHERE...the king is scrambling to retool his agenda.because he was solid about who he was going to debate.....THAT has been altered and his game plan no longer fits....HE IS THE GERIATRIC GUY now and age will play an important role in this race. JMO
ANY TIME ,ANY PLACE....is now, Let me get my game plan gathered. (off topic,but I wanted to address the integrity issue....RICK has his view and I have mind...but when I am wrong,I state I am wrong.)
