Registering Illegal Aliens To Vote

Mistakes Were Made (intentionally?)

Oh, no! That's 306 in 3 years... 100/year. Gawd knows how 100 votes a year might doom TrumpleThinSkin to a life of irrelevance...

Oh, wait... The criminally convicted 34x-felon is already senile and irrelevant.

That is just the one Oregon admits to. Add dozens of other blue states and cities trying to create new illegal alien voters and it can decide elections.

FredHayek wrote: That is just the one Oregon admits to. Add dozens of other blue states and cities trying to create new illegal alien voters and it can decide elections.

Okay Fred, time to man up. Give us your evidence that states are registering undocumented immigrants to vote.

Think you can do that? Or are you just going to continue to promote lies and rumors?

Rock The Vote.
Many states have programs that register to vote new drivers. Very easy to do both at the same time.

This becomes even more likely in Blue States that want to let illegals vote in local and statewide races. Can be confusing for poll workers to differentiate between local and national ballots.

Still waiting on your evidence that show undocumented immigrants are registering to vote in numbers that would actually sway an election.

koobookie wrote: Still waiting on your evidence that show undocumented immigrants are registering to vote in numbers that would actually sway an election.

It is even more sinister than that. Illegal aliens aren't as likely to vote, so unscrupulous Democrat operatives get their names and vote for them. Very easy with mail in ballots.

Why scream for evidence? If I show you a conservative source, you will refuse to accept it. Your liberal press will refuse to cover these stories. And Google has been shown to repress stories that show Democrats in a bad light.

This is how Democrats censor the truth.

Face it, the game is crooked. While you scream about Russians, Google is controlling the narrative the whole world over.

FredHayek wrote: It is even more sinister than that. Illegal aliens aren't as likely to vote, so unscrupulous Democrat operatives get their names and vote for them. Very easy with mail in ballots.

Prove it. Otherwise, it's just another of your numerous, baseless lies.

FredHayek wrote: Why scream for evidence? If I show you a conservative source, you will refuse to accept it. Your liberal press will refuse to cover these stories. And Google has been shown to repress stories that show Democrats in a bad light.

Again, what are your conservative sources? What do you consider liberal sources?

Do you think that, for once, you could back up your claims with a neutral, middle of the road news source? Think you could do that? Think you could go to reuters, or apnews, and back up your claims?

I posted a chart of media bias a couple weeks ago. You seemed to accept the general layout of that chart, although you didn't actually state that you outright agreed with it. So, go look at that chart, find a media source that's middle of the road, and then search that site for your "illegals are voting" story or your "illegal names are being co-opted by liberals."

I bet you won't find it. You'll only find your stories on conservative "news" sites.

I actually read all sides and come to a conclusion. Just because a source might be "more objective" doesn't mean the are always objective. Why it helps to have multiple sources.

And media sources can also shift. Forbes has become much more liberal, as has Drudge in the past decade.