Kamala Harris & Bret Baier

Rick wrote:

homeagain wrote: u guys r so entertaining.....BOTH candidates r struggling with interviews.....BUT, I guarantee u the AGE DIFFERENCE WILL BE THE DECIDING FACTOR, THAT AND GENDER.......PLACE A BET?

I wish you would attempt to inform yourself by watching some of the interviews. If you only react to what we say and don't know what we are talking about... what's the point?

As for your bet, I'll take it. The more she talks, the worse she looks (just like with the 2020 primary that she quickly bombed). Before you place your bet, you should look at how many minorities are switching to Trump... you will be surprised. Harris still refuses to say what she will do with the economy and the majority of people care more about that than they care about slaughtering babies.

1ST BOLDED.....the exact same thing could be stated about Trump...specifically the last memorial moments of just listen music,,,who wants to do A Q and A?

2nd bolded....polls r just a snap shot in a moment in time...IF SOMEONE ASKED ME WHO I WAS GOING TO VOTE FOR I WOULD MISLED THEM JUST TO MESS WITH THEIR STATS. THEN THERE R THOSE WHO CAN NOT BRING THEMSELVES TO BE HONEST IN PUBLIC AND WILL SECRETLY VOTE THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT THEY DECLARED .......the odds r NOT in Trump's favor, regard;less
of what the MSM is indicating (what ever that might be)......WAIT AND WATCH.....LANDSLIDE FOR HARRIS.....(MY prediction, let us see if astrology is accurate and credible)

Mark Cuban gives the PERFECT response to Kamala Harris's Fox interview:

"The beautiful thing about the Bret Baier interview is that Kamala Harris understood and responded to each question.

She used examples of policies. She gave real world context.

When Brett went hard after her. She didn’t call him names. She didn’t quit the interview. She didn’t make things up. She never once complained the questions were tough. She never played the victim card. She didn’t lose her temper. She didn’t take the bait to diminish or talk down to Trump supporters.

She stood up to him with force and never backed down.

He has been the President and campaigning for 9 years. Kamala Harris has caught up to him in just 100 days. That speaks volumes.

It’s why people want to vote for her. That’s why so many Republicans and Independents are supporting her.

She is everything her opponent is not and will never be: strong, smart and measured."

Anyone else notice that Kamala Harris did not call for Fox News broadcast license to be revoked?

koobookie wrote: Anyone else notice that Kamala Harris did not call for Fox News broadcast license to be revoked?

Thats because they don’t manufacture news like the left does. The leftist morons are now saying Trump is going to use the military against everyone who doesn’t agree with him. The delusion has become an epidemic in the retard media. Morning Joke is the absolute best if you want some great morning comedy.

Seven million Americans saw that Harris neltdown.

FredHayek wrote: Seven million Americans saw that Harris neltdown.

A meltdown? Were you watching the same .... Ohhh, that's right. You're male. You talk that way to women all the time, so it seems to you that Baier was the strongman winner. Now it all makes sense.

koobookie wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Seven million Americans saw that Harris neltdown.

A meltdown? Were you watching the same .... Ohhh, that's right. You're male. You talk that way to women all the time, so it seems to you that Baier was the strongman winner. Now it all makes sense.

Wow, now you know how Fred talks to women? You have some amazing powers, or do you know Fred in real life? I think you would make better arguments if you didn’t assume things about people you really don’t know.

Rick wrote:

koobookie wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Seven million Americans saw that Harris neltdown.

A meltdown? Were you watching the same .... Ohhh, that's right. You're male. You talk that way to women all the time, so it seems to you that Baier was the strongman winner. Now it all makes sense.

Wow, now you know how Fred talks to women? You have some amazing powers, or do you know Fred in real life? I think you would make better arguments if you didn’t assume things about people you really don’t know.

I saw how Baier talked to Harris. It's an obvious male ploy to try and dominate a powerful woman through constant interruptions, talk over, hand signals, not letting her finish or answer, etc. The fact that neither you nor Fred noticed that - or if you did notice, didn't say anything - tells me that this is probably your M.O. in dealing with strong women.

He was very courteous. He only interrupted when she refused to answer straight forward questions and then went into her usual diversion to Trump.

Print off the transcript and point me to the questions she actually answered. You won’t because it would confirm my point.

koobookie wrote:

Rick wrote:

koobookie wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Seven million Americans saw that Harris neltdown.

A meltdown? Were you watching the same .... Ohhh, that's right. You're male. You talk that way to women all the time, so it seems to you that Baier was the strongman winner. Now it all makes sense.

Wow, now you know how Fred talks to women? You have some amazing powers, or do you know Fred in real life? I think you would make better arguments if you didn’t assume things about people you really don’t know.

I saw how Baier talked to Harris. It's an obvious male ploy to try and dominate a powerful woman through constant interruptions, talk over, hand signals, not letting her finish or answer, etc. The fact that neither you nor Fred noticed that - or if you did notice, didn't say anything - tells me that this is probably your M.O. in dealing with strong women.

Should we only allow other women to interview women candidates?