Military Force Against Civilians?

The media claims Trump promises to do this. Yet the current Biden/Harris administration has changed the rules to permit it.

That's just a bit different than threatening to send the military after your political opponents. trump has already told us that his administration will be one of retribution.

In the age of Garland's DOJ Lawfare, eye for an eye, right?

FredHayek wrote: In the age of Garland's DOJ Lawfare, eye for an eye, right?

If trump did not commit the crime, he wouldn't be charged, right?

Geeez, Fred, you and the other conservatives here are really defending trump, when I'm pretty sure you all know, deep down, that he's guilty of the charges. In fact, he's been convicted time and time again in a court of law. He's been indicted by independent Grand Juries, yet you boys continue to say he's being unjustly accused.

"Lawfare." Grow up, Fred.

Fraud. - Theft - Rape - etc. That's trump.

They had to cancel the statute of limitations in order to charge Trump.

The DNC thumb on the scales of Justice.

FredHayek wrote: They had to cancel the statute of limitations in order to charge Trump.

The DNC thumb on the scales of Justice.

I am stunned that you still defend a convicted felon. Amazing.

koobookie wrote:

FredHayek wrote: They had to cancel the statute of limitations in order to charge Trump.

The DNC thumb on the scales of Justice.

I am stunned that you still defend a convicted felon. Amazing.

Give up your morals, screw law and order, be a arrogant ignoramus and be anti-American and you too can comfortably defend a convicted felon like those MAGA's on MMT

koobookie wrote:

FredHayek wrote: They had to cancel the statute of limitations in order to charge Trump.

The DNC thumb on the scales of Justice.

I am stunned that you still defend a convicted felon. Amazing.

Be careful using that lawfare, it can be a double edged sword.

Show where "lawfare" has been used.