So-o, I answered Rick's query about ANOTHER ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT, but I can't find the thread,so I am starting a new topic........COULD THERE BE ANOTHER ATTEMPT, BUT FROM ANOTHER COUNTRY, this ,to me, is a concrete concern. and I stated in the other thread....."what makes u think it would come from the USA.".......other countries r very concentrated on our election,because who becomes the leader will determine MANY FACTORS for
major players. (hire a puppet "patsy" and let them take the fall)........I do not think that is a fantasy. jmo
Who would benefit the most from Trump being dead, the Democrat party or our enemy countries? Who has spent the last 8 years trying to take Trump out (not necessarily dead), our enemies or the Democrat party?
If you are a deranged Democrat who thinks Trump is Hitler and will destroy our county, you are a liar if you don’t want him dead, PERIOD
Rick wrote: Who would benefit the most from Trump being dead, the Democrat party or our enemy countries? Who has spent the last 8 years trying to take Trump out (not necessarily dead), our enemies or the Democrat party?
If you are a deranged Democrat who thinks Trump is Hitler and will destroy our county, you are a liar if you don’t want him dead, PERIOD
Democratic, Rick. It's called the "Democratic Party."
Who would benefit the most if trump were dead? Easy. JD Vance, which would be a disaster for the country.
I want trump to stay alive and lose the election, and then be found guilty on all the legal cases , and then go to prison. I know that, given his mental and physical health, he will probably never see the inside of a prison cell, but that's what he deserves. But no, Rick we don't want him dead. You are, once again, wrong.
Who has spent the last 8 years trying to take trump out? Another easy question. The DOJ, Rick. You know that, but apparently, your TDS is so strong that you can't recognize justice when you see it.
There’s not much “democratic” about a party that doesn’t let its constituents pick their presidential candidate. There’s nothing democratic about a party that uses the force of government to go after their political opponents. There’s nothing democratic about a party the takes money from taxpayers in order to buy votes.
Sorry Koobookie, the DEMOCRAT party is the party of Democrats, it’s not the party of democracy.
Rick wrote: There’s not much “democratic” about a party that doesn’t let its constituents pick their presidential candidate. There’s nothing democratic about a party that uses the force of government to go after their political opponents. There’s nothing democratic about a party the takes money from taxpayers in order to buy votes.
Sorry Koobookie, the DEMOCRAT party is the party of Democrats, it’s not the party of democracy.
I'm just pointing out your ignorance of the proper use of the word.
If trump didn't do the crime, then four grand juries would not have indicted him. You can cry all you want and scream "lawfare," but this is our system of JUSTICE. The fact that you cannot see that trump is a criminal says a lot about you.
Very troubling precedent for the Democrat Party to set.
Ejecting the primary winning nominee without even a trial.
Replacing him with not the Democrat who came in 2nd place either.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
Rick wrote: There’s not much “democratic” about a party that doesn’t let its constituents pick their presidential candidate. There’s nothing democratic about a party that uses the force of government to go after their political opponents. There’s nothing democratic about a party the takes money from taxpayers in order to buy votes.
Sorry Koobookie, the DEMOCRAT party is the party of Democrats, it’s not the party of democracy.
I'm just pointing out your ignorance of the proper use of the word.
If trump didn't do the crime, then four grand juries would not have indicted him. You can cry all you want and scream "lawfare," but this is our system of JUSTICE. The fact that you cannot see that trump is a criminal says a lot about you.
Have you ever wondered where these charges would go if Trump was tried in a city that wasn’t 99% Democrat with a Democrat judge and Democrat jury? Of course you haven’t.
koobookie wrote:
I'm just pointing out your ignorance of the proper use of .
Yes K, you’re very good at jabbing me and I’m sure it makes you feel better about yourself.
However, when I say “Democrat party” , it’s a jab at your party that is far from Democratic, it’s not a jab at you personally. My use of words is intentional.