i HAVE ARMED MYSELF WITH FACTS AND THAT HAS PROTECTED ME FROM "GOD COMPLEX" DOCTORS HERE ON THE WESTERN SLOPE...
MedPage Today's enterprise and investigative team covers a lot of ground. We jump in when there's breaking news in healthcare. We write second-day stories on the implications of that news. We craft compelling feature stories about interesting trends and people in medicine.
And then there are the special projects -- those deeper stories that take months to put together. Reporters immerse themselves in an issue, often to highlight wrongdoing or to bring clarity to controversy.
Yet these stories are the ones most often overlooked.
That's why MedPage Today is highlighting our strongest enterprise and investigative stories from this year. Our reporters published pieces for two high-profile fellowships in 2024: The National Institute for Health Care Management (NIHCM)ojournalism grant, and the Center for Health Journalism (CHJ) fellowship.
U R SO WRONG ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF THIS SOURCE......OF COURSE JMO
The CDC Hasn't Asked States to Track Deaths Linked to Abortion Bans
— Experts say it's a missed opportunity to study the laws' impacts
by Kavitha Surana, Robin Fields, and Ziva Branstetter, ProPublica
December 29, 2024
This story was originally published by ProPublica. Sign up for The Big Story newsletter in a new tab or window to receive stories like this one in your inbox.
The source is tainted with politics HA . . . perhaps not everything, but there's enough there there to infer a political slant to their "reporting", just as with the NY Times. That they limit themselves to medical topics doesn't establish that they are free of ideological biases. Q.E.D.
guidance for the agency on questions around generative AI-enabled medical devices. The Digital Health Advisory Committee advocated developing a regulatory approach that focuses on premarket performance evaluation and risk management as well as continuous performance monitoring after these devices are on the market.
However, the committee stopped short of offering specific recommendations, suggesting that regulatory changes are not in the immediate future for healthcare AI.
"There is a level of caution and thoughtfulness that I'm hearing more from the regulatory community recently," Brian Anderson, MD, chief executive officer of the Coalition for Health AI (CHAI), told Medpage Today, adding that "it's getting the cart in front of the horse, if you create a robust regulatory process that's not informed by where private sector innovators are going."
In the year to come, Anderson predicted, healthcare AI companies will likely continue to work alongside health systems and health researchers to develop best practices and determine a common definition for how good, responsible AI should work.
HAVING BEEN A VICTIM OF A.I.FUCK UP...MY PCP USED AN APP THAT HAD MANY OMISSIONS AND ERRORS IN MY MED. FILE.....I DID A DEEP DIVE AND MET WITH TH CMO OF THE MEDICAL OFFICE....I WAS ARMED FOR BEAR...THE ERRORS WERE CORRECTED BEFORE I RELEASED THE FILE TO MY NEW PCP....THERE R NO GUARDRAILS. ARTICLES LIKE THE ONE ABOVE AND MANY OTHER TOPICS HAVE BEEN EXTREMELY USEFUL....DID U KNOW THERE IS A BIG SHORTAGE OF I.V. FLUID FOR MED. USE? THAT IS BECAUSE OF THE HURRICANE THAT CAME THRU THE STATE THAT SUPPLIES THE LARGEST VOLUME OF THE PRODUCT.....GOOD TO KNOW IF U R SCHEDULED FOR SURG. OR HAVE OTHER MEDICAL PROBLEMS THAT REQUIRE THIS PRODUCT.......THE SOURCE IS NOT BOGUS AND YOUR POV IS NOT VALID....JMO
homeagain wrote: SOURCE IS NOT BOGUS AND YOUR POV IS NOT VALID....JMO
Biased is not equivalent to bogus HA, and that's the difference between us, and why you are led astray and I am not. I recognize that everyone is biased, I look for the bias in everything I read. You see familiar phrases, which confirm your own bias, and discount the subtitles a "reporter" employs to convince you that what you are reading is fact, devoid of bias. That is why you believed the polls were wrong and I, among many others, understood that Trump's support was underrepresented. Your bias is confirmed by the sources you use . . . I trust no source to provide me with the "truth" . . . I know all of them are biased and it is my responsibility to sift through what I am presented to find the "truth".
By the by . . . when do you plan on making good on your bet that you made because the bias you believed was absent keep your sight veiled on how the election would end?
