COPPER JUST GOT CLOBBERED

THIS IS FOR ALL WHO R AGAINST PRO CHOICE......THE VERY REAL AND RAW ISSUE IS THIS....WHO IS GOING TO RAISE THIS CHILD TO ADULTHOOD? WHO IS GOING TO GO THE DISTANCE AND FUND THE LIFE OF A CHILD TO 18 Y.O.....I DO NOT SEE ANY PERSON OR ORGANIZATION,RELIGIOUS OR OTHERWISE ANSWERING THE VERY REAL PROBLEM OF TAKING THAT ON....WHEN THE WOMEN CAN NOT AFFORD TO FEED ANOTHER MOUTH...MARRIED OR OTHERWISE.,WHEN ABUSE OF THE INFANT IS PRESENT BECAUSE OF A FORCED LAW,WHEN
THE ADOPTION AGENCIES/PROCESS IS TOTALLY OVERWHELMED AND INEFFECTIVE.....WHO IS GOING TO STAND UP AND SAY"I WILL ADOPT THIS INFANT AND RAISE IT TO THE BEST OF MY ABILITY, TO BE AN UPSTANDING, INTELLIGENT AND COMPASSION INDIVIDUAL"....I DO NOT SEE ANY SUPPORT FOR THAT DECISION......U (COLLECTIVELY) RAIL AGAINST THE ISSUE, YET WHEN THE REALITY OF WHAT IT TAKES TO BE PRESENT FOR THAT INFANT IS ASKED.....THERE IS SILENCE......THE PROBLEM OF PLACING UP FOR ADOPTION IS A HUGE FIASCO....THE FACILITIES R OVERWHELMED,UNDER FUNDED, UNDERSTAFFED AND THE CHILD GETS TO BE A FOOTBALLL..PASSED FROM ONE FOSTER TO ANOTHER FOSTER AD NAUSEAM...THEN , AFTER GOING THRU MANY FOSTERS SITUATIONS (SOME CRUEL AND ABUSIVE)...THEY AGE OUT OF THE SYSTEM AND BECOME HOMELESS.....THAT IS THE REALITY, BUT ,OF COURSE THOSE FACTORS R MINOR...BECAUSE ANTI ABORTION IS THE LAW AND AFTERMATH OF THE LAW IS NEVER ADDRESSED.........KIDS R LIVING ON THE STREET AND MAKING A LIVING BEING "PIMPED OUT:"......AND OH, THERE R CERTAINLY ENOUGH CUSTOMERS WHO R KINKY AND THE SUPPLY
OF CHILDREN IS ENDLESS....YES, VOTE AGAINST PRO CHOICE AND VOTE FOR CHILD ABUSE.


WHAT A TRAVESTY TO SAY... i AM ANTI ABORTION....THE MACRO IS NEVER ENTERED INTO THE EQUATION....CHILD ABUSE AND NEGLECT R THE END RESULT....OH BUT HOW PROUD U MUST BE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE "SAVE A LIFE" MOTTO.....HYPOCRISY AT IT'S FINEST.






www.songlyrics.com/michael-george/hand-to-mouth-lyrics/

homeagain wrote: IT IS SUCH A SHAME THAT I AM NOT HAVING THIS DISCUSSION WITH A WOMAN,WHO IS STILL OF REPRODUCTION AGE......IT WOULD BE THOUGHT PROVOKING AND POSSIBLE OPPOSITE OF YOUR POSTS......MISCARRYING AND MEDICALLY IN DANGER, I WOULD VENTURE TO SAY,HER POV WOULD BE '' I WILL LITIGATE THIS OBSCENE ORDEAL".....AND LAWYER UP

Neither Roe nor Casey was about miscarrying and medically in danger, were they HA. No, the cases were about elective homicides and access to them.

The laws in place in all 50 States provide for preserving the life of the woman should complications arise, not a single State requires the woman place the life in utero ahead of her own when she is in danger. Of course, with all of the scare tactics and false narratives pushed by those who desire no restrictions at all on an elective homicide, it is no wonder that their intentional misinformation campaign has had an ill effect on the health of pregnant women.

Under your logic, let's execute all felons because we don't have the money nor resources to take care of them.

Irony? The fetuses are innocents.

According to the Left, I must pay reparations for what 3% of the population was doing in 1860, but I don't have to take responsibility for getting pregnant or getting someone else pregnant.

ZING......RIGHT OVER THE HEAD.....OMISSION,DEFLECTION,DENIAL...WHICH VERB SHOULD I SELECT.

AS TO YOUR LATEST POST....U R SO MISINFORMED. I AM ON THE ETHICS COMMITTEE AT MY HOSPITAL....i ALSO SUBSCRIBE TO SEVERAL MEDICAL WEBSITES AND MEDICAL PERSONNEL WHO BLOG ON THOSE WEBSITES....THEY R ON THE FRONTLINE AND RELATE WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING IN REAL TIME ON THE GROUND.....U MAY THINK THAT THE AVAILABILITY
OF EMER, OB-GYN MEDICAL CARE IS OFFERED WHEN NEEDED,BUT THAT IS NOT TRUE ON A UNIVERSAL BASIS.....AND YES WOMEN HAVE DIED BECAUSE DOCTORS R AFRAID OF THEIR LICENSES BEING YANKED IF THEY PROVIDE THE EMER CARE......THIS IS NOT FAKE NEWS,THIS IS REALITY...BUT THEN U R NOT A WOMAN THAT HAS TO CONTEND WITH THE OBSCENITY OF
THE OBVIOUS....IF U R MISCARRYING AND BLEEDING OUT, A D.& C. IS NEEDED...THAT THEN PUTS THE DOCTOR IN DIRECT CONFLICT.......... U DO NOT HAVE THE COMPLETE PICTURE,SO
PERHAPS IT MIGHT BE BEST TO LISTEN .......

With the false narratives being pushed by the pro-elective homicide camps, its no wonder that doctors are afraid. Better if the doctors were to listen to the courts, who have consistently ruled that the abortion statutes do no pertain to a woman experiencing complications which threaten her life or place her at risk of serious bodily harm, which, oh by the way, are the same exemptions granted when a person commits any other act of homicide under those conditions, courts recognize as valid an affirmative claim of self-defense to justify or excuse and act of homicide committed by an individual. All 50 States recognize this exemption from their laws . . . every court case has resulted in this decision.

But those aren't the circumstances pertaining to Roe or Casey, are they HA. No, those are the arguments that the pro-elective homicide camps inevitably resort to in a vain attempt to justify their position of opposing any limits on access to an elective homicide.

Women are being harmed because they, and doctors, are listening to the misinformation propaganda fed into the society by the no-limits crowd instead of the facts. Legislation only pertains to an elective procedure to artificially terminate a pregnancy, not medical care that is necessary, proper, and follows all of the minimum standard of care guidelines when a complication manifests itself during the course of a pregnancy.

If the no-limits crowd would stop lying about the actual state of affairs in the pursuit of political profit, doctors wouldn't be afraid to provide the standard of care required by the medical protocols, women wouldn't be afraid to seek the care they need. If doctors in New York would stop practicing political ideology instead of medicine, you wouldn't have women in Texas whose chemical elective homicides resulted in an incomplete evacuation of the pregnancy tissue that threatens their life. The suffering is the direct result of the lies being fomented by the no-limits crowd, not the legislation in any of the States.

The Left: these unwanted children are going to have horrible lives I predict. So we need to kill them!



And they think the Republicans are the cruel ones.

OH, CAN I THEN ASSUME U R GOING TO BE 'PRESENT' FOR AN UNWANTED INFANT? CAN I THEN ASSUME U R FINANCIAL AND PHYSICALLY PREPARED TO BE A FATHER TO THIS HUMAN BEING THAT HAS NO SUPPORT? THAT'S 18 YEARS OF BEING 'PRESENT'......WAITING FOR YOUR ANSWER,OR FOR THAT MATTER,ANYONE WHO HAS ENOUGH COMPASSION AND HUMANITY TO "BRING IT"....(TO THE UNWANTED INFANT).......THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING...SO FROM YOUR POV...WHAT IS THE ANSWER TO THE ABOVE?

The best answer is personal responsibility for one's actions. The next best answer is adoption. There is a long list of people in line waiting to adopt an unwanted HUMAN child.

But yeah, it's much quicker and easier to kill the baby and sell it's body parts.

The Left just acknowledged that they would rather vacuum the fetuses out than give them a chance to be adopted.

The Left is cruel.

Remember the old Democrat Party? They believed in protecting the innocents.

The current Democrat Party? They give asylum to foreign gang members and layoff city workers so they can afford to house these felons in our neighborhoods.



And they can't understand why they lost the House, Senate, and White House.

HE PROBLEM OF PLACING UP FOR ADOPTION IS A HUGE FIASCO....THE FACILITIES R OVERWHELMED,UNDER FUNDED, UNDERSTAFFED AND THE CHILD GETS TO BE A FOOTBALLL..PASSED FROM ONE FOSTER TO ANOTHER FOSTER AD NAUSEAM...THEN , AFTER GOING THRU MANY FOSTERS SITUATIONS (SOME CRUEL AND ABUSIVE)...THEY AGE OUT OF THE SYSTEM AND BECOME HOMELESS.....THAT IS THE REALITY, BUT ,OF COURSE THOSE FACTORS R MINOR...BECAUSE ANTI ABORTION IS THE LAW AND AFTERMATH OF THE LAW IS NEVER ADDRESSED.........KIDS R LIVING ON THE STREET AND MAKING A LIVING BEING "PIMPED OUT:"......AND OH, THERE R CERTAINLY ENOUGH CUSTOMERS WHO R KINKY AND THE SUPPLY
OF CHILDREN IS ENDLESS....YES, VOTE AGAINST PRO CHOICE AND VOTE FOR CHILD ABUSE.

(APPARENTLY U MISSED THIS POST)...TO RICK, WHO SAYS ADOPTION IS THE ANSWER.
U FIRST FOSTER TO SEE IF THE CHILD CAN ADJUST AND THE PARENTS CAN "DEAL"......EVERYONE WANTS THE 'PERFECT LITTLE BABY'....SOMETIMES THAT DOES NOT OCCUR,THE PARENT CANNOT BOND OR THE CHILD HAS PROBLEMS AND THE DIFFICULTIES
THAT ENSUE R OVERWHELMING TO THE ADOPTER....THE CHILD IS THEN '''REHOMED''...ANOTHER FOSTER BECOMES THE PARENT. THE PROCESS OF A SUCCESSFUL ADOPTION IS A VERY LONG ROAD TO TRAVEL....A MATCH IS THE OBJECTIVE,SOMETIMES THAT DOES NOT OCCUR...AND THEN THE ABOVE KICKS IN....

MY NEXT DOOR NEIGHBOR HAS BEEN THRU THE EXPERIENCE (HER CHILD WAS NOT AN INFANT)....SHE CAME INTO THE FAMILY WITH ATTENTION DEFICIT DISORDER,THE PREVIOUS FOSTER PARENT DEALT WITH BY PUNISHING HER....THERE WERE ALOT OF ISSUES AND IT WAS ROUGH GOING, BUT THE OPTION WAS NOT REHOME,BUT RATHER PATIENCE,PERSISTENCE
LOVE....THE ADOPTEE IS STILL LEARNING THE WORKINGS OF THE REAL WORLD AND IT HAS BEEN A LONG HAUL.

U DON;T UNDERSTAND, THE ADOPTER WANTS A CERTAIN PROFILE FOR A CHILD,AND IS UNREALISTIC ABOUT THEIR EXPECTATIONS....THAT IS A GENERAL RULE OF THUMB...ASK THE CASE WORKERS...THEY WILL TELL U PLACEMENT IS A PROCESS, NOT A 'PICK UP YOUR ORDER"