R'S ROYAL REIGN....

Your assumption is that there’s a large percentage of Republicans voters who are unhappy with the current president. What are you basing that assumption on? If new Republican registrations are rising while Democrat registrations are falling, that tells me that more people are liking what Trump is doing and they don’t like what we just went through for four years.

Show your evidence

BACK AT U ....BACK UP YOUR CLAIM....

Wall Street Journal this week. Democrats have lost over five million registered voters. Republicans are adding millions of more voters.

A registration doesn't count as a vote but I think decades of Democrats scolding us about how much America sucks has maybe grown tiresome for many citizens. Especially when we are approaching our 250th birthday.

Would you rather Celebrate? Or complain?


We are now the oldest continuously operating democracy with a constitution around the world and have trice saved Europe from kings, fascists, and even communists.

Democrats can’t exist without their malcontent and victim base. Democrats can’t afford to lose more people who hate the country, so they have to keep creating more. The easiest way to increase those numbers is to bring people into the country who have no allegiance to it. Fortunately, Trump single handedly stopped that plan.

JUST WOW....WHAT A STRETCH, AS I STATED BEFORE,BACK AT U....POST THE PROOF RICK

FredHayek wrote: We are now the oldest continuously operating democracy with a constitution around the world and have trice saved Europe from kings, fascists, and even communists.

We are not now, nor have we ever been, a democracy. We are, and hopefully will always remain, a constitutional republic which uses some democratic processes in its execution.

Central to our ordered liberty form of government is the philosophy that individual liberty is the highest political value and that it is the people, not their government, which is sovereign. Fundamental individual rights may be restricted only to the extent that they interfere with the fundamental rights of other individuals. The people decided to institute the federal government, and we could, if we wished, simple vote it out of existence, just as it was voted into existence. We don't need a violent revolution to alter our form of government. There is no king, no dictator, that we need to take arms to defeat. All it takes is the will of the people and the federal government can be disbanded at an election.

It is this concept that is referred to when one appeals to the "original intent" of the framers.

In a democracy, the government is sovereign and the liberty and rights of the individual are subject to alteration. Now, I know the collectivists would love to "fundamentally transform" our republic into a democracy, but it is our sacred duty to ensure that their endeavor fails, miserably.

We don't need a violent revolution to alter our form of government. There is no king, no dictator, that we need to take arms to defeat. All it takes is the will of the people and the federal government can be disbanded at an election. PER PS

THANK U, EVEN I UNDERSTOOD THE INTENT,THE PEOPLE WILL WAKE UP AND SEE REALITY,OR THEY WILL FIND THE UNFORTUNATE FATE OF AN OLIGARCH RULING THEIR LIVES.....I PREFER TO SEE REALITY AND LIVE WITH CHOICES, NOT EDICTS

The closest thing to an oligarch that this country has ever had was FDR and his "New Deal"

WAIT AND WATCH.....ALL IS NOT SEEN...YET

homeagain wrote: WAIT AND WATCH.....ALL IS NOT SEEN...YET

Source?