DEEP DIVE REVEALS DECISIVE DECISIONS

Since Marbury v Madison in 1803 one of the roles of any federal court, including SCOTUS, is judicial review of laws to establish compliance with, or violation of, the federal charter. Interpretation of the Constitution is as old as the document itself is. And yes, different courts, different judges, different justices, different legislatures, different presidents, and different citizens are going to have different interpretations of the document.

Because we are humans, and humans are flawed, even SCOTUS, as was the case with Roe, are going to make mistakes. That's why even stare decisis can be overturned. Can you imagine what this country would look like if it couldn't be? No Brown v Board of Education decision, no Obergefell v. Hodges, no Michelin Tire Corp. v. Wages, no Katz v United States, Miranda v Arizona, or, literally, hundreds of other SCOTUS cases originally decided and then overturned by a later court.

One could, using your argument, state that Roe failed to follow the Constitution because the opinion was decided by people who leaned a certain direction politically. By your argument, no court decision follows the Constitution because every judicial decision involves a judge who aligns with a certain ideology. But because of your political leanings, and your absolute hatred for anything to do with Trump, you assign any decision which is contrary to the outcome you'd like to see as being the result of fealty demanded by a wannabe oligarch/dictator/king.

I know you disagree with some of the court's decisions, and agree with others, just as I do, just as every citizen does, but the argument that the current justices are making decisions based on a personal loyalty to Trump, which Trump demands of them, is so ludicrous on its face that no person with even a tether to reality would dare offer it up for serious consideration.

UNICORN UNIVERSE PREVAILS.....TRUMP'S TRIUMPH IS SECURING LOYALISTS....THAT IS THE
PREREQUISITE FOR ANY ALLIANCE HE SEEKS....IT IS ONE OF THE REASON HE FAILS WITH PUTIN AND KEEPS STATING "HE WILL BE VERY,VERY MAD/UPSET IF (FILL IN THE BLANK) PUTIN DOES NOT/DOES WHATEVER......HE GETS "NO RESPECT" AND IT PISSES HIM OFF....BEING EX-KGB ,THE ''NON LOYALIST'' IS NOT GOING TO ACQUIESCE TO THE AMERICAN PRESIDENT. U R
ILL INFORMED OF TRUMP'S M.O.......''MY WAY OR THE HYWAY''..... AND HE HAS ACCOMPLISHED THAT IN MULTIPLE FORMS.....U R NOT THAT UNINTELLIGENT,PS

When SCOTUS rules 8-1 that the federal workforce reduction may proceed while the legal challenges to the executive order make their way through the courts, that has not a thing to do with your misconceived "loyalist" requirements and everything to do with telling a lower court that they exceeded their constitutional and judicial authority. The only "loyalist" to be seen here is Brown, who couldn't even get the support of Sotomayor or Kagan.

Roberts owes no loyalty to Trump, Trump had not a thing to do with his selection to court nor his elevation to Chief Justice. Thomas owes no loyalty to Trump, Trump had not a thing to do with his selection to be a justice on the court. Alito owes no loyalty to Trump, Trump had not a thing to do with his selection to be a justice on the court.

Neither Gorsuch, nor Kavanaugh, nor Barrett owe any loyalty to Trump even though Trump is responsible for their selection to be members of the court. They will be justices long after Trump has left office, long after Trump has any authority as president of these United States, likely long after Trump's life has ceased. They, like Sotomayor, like Kagan, are seeking to fulfill their oath to "support and defend" the Constitution of the United States, not intentionally subvert it in the manner you wish to allege. These three justices, nominated by Trump, will never, ever, be a majority of the court. The only president who ever had the privilege of nominating a majority of a Supreme Court was FDR, and he's the closest example there is to an oligarch/dictator/king occupying the office of president this Union is ever likely to see.

Great points. These Justices don't owe anyone anything.

Do you really think Clarence Thomas cares who is in the Oval Office currently?

Do you honestly think he talks with Trump every week to get his marching orders?

apnews.com/article/trump-loyalty-white-h...5652655c86203222f47c

Some officials have referred to the newcomers sent by the White House to federal agencies disparagingly as “MAGA commissars,” a reference to Communist Party officials from the former Soviet Union.

They are generally young and many do not appear to have particular expertise or background in the portfolios of the agencies in which they are working, according to three U.S. officials, who, like others, spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals.

They said the screeners seem to be looking for even the slightest divergence between candidates and Trump’s MAGA movement and “America First” policies. A negative social media post or a photograph with a Trump opponent has been enough for some applications to be rejected or put on hold for further review.

One official said he and several colleagues from various agencies had been told that even if they passed the initial vetting process to be admitted into the applicant pool, they would still need to prove their bona fides and convince interviewers of their “enthusiasm” to put in place Trump’s policies, including by providing references from people whose loyalty had already been established.

OK, LET'S GET SOME CLARITY....AP SOURCE IS LYING THRU THEIR TEETH AND R "WOKE", TRULY THE TRASH U SPIT OUT AND THINK IT IS THE LAST WORD, IS STUNNING. FOR THOSE OF US WHO "SEE" THE SHIT TALK AND KNOW,WITHOUT A DOUBT,THAT BLINDERS R PRESENT ,
AND THE UNICORN UNIVERSE IS UNITED IN THEIR UNAWARENESS....WE JUST SHRUG AND
AND SAY WHAT WILL BE,WILL BE....WAIT AND WATCH....BECAUSE THE BLINDING LIGHT OF THE TRUTH WILL BRING YOU TO YOUR KNEES....EVENTUALLY

Why should Trump hire people who will be against his agenda?

The big mistake Trump made in his first term was hiring people who wanted to keep him in check. Guardrails.

SME'S R ESSENTIAL FOR ANY ENTERPRISE, INCLUDING THE GOVERNMENT..(SUBJECT MATTER EXPERT=SME) THEN AN INDIVIDUAL WHO WILL LOOK U DIRECTLY IN THE EYE AND SPEAK THE TRUTH, IT'S CALLED FEEDBACK THAT WILL GIVE U ANOTHER POV AND ALLOW U TO REVIEW DECISIONS/ACTIONS...''GROUP SPEAK' IS THE OPPOSITE OF THIS CONCEPT. WHEN U HAVE "YES MEN' SURROUNDING U,THAT PUTS U AT A DISADVANTAGE....BECAUSE THE ENEMY KNOWS,ALL TO WELL,THE M.O. AND WILL HAVE "MADE" U....SETTING UP A TRAP WOULD BE LIKE CHILD'S PLAY....THIS ISN'T 3D CHESS ,IT IS SPYCRAFT....AND PUTIN IS EX KGB.....TRUMP IS NOT "'ALL THAT",HE IS TOO EGO DRIVEN TO ADMIT HIS "PLAN" HAS FAULTS AND EXECUTION OF THAT PLAN WILL BE UNEVEN AND PRODUCE UNFORESEEN EVENTS TO HIS DETRIMENT, WAIT AND WATCH

You've given a perfect overview of why the Biden administration was such an abysmal, wasteful, enterprise. A group of people seeking a way to implement their identity political policies for political profit regardless of the end results on the economy or foreign policy. That's why Trump has so much work ahead of his administration to remove all the cancerous tendrils infecting the executive branch. I don't have to wait & watch, the entire Union lived through that nightmare for the last 4 years.

What you wish to overlook, in your quest to make villains of your ideological opponents, is that SCOTUS is a panel of SMEs whose expertise is on the subject of our jurisprudence.

You also overlook that decisions are implemented regardless of which party currently holds sway. Collectivist are notoriously short-sighted in this regard. A decision which limits the power of a single district court judge to issue an all encompassing injunction limits the ability of every district court judge, even those in ideological agreement during an administration where the loyal opposition holds sway.

And while the collectivist might only look at how such a decision affects the current landscape, the individualist, the originalist, sees it as a long term limit on the notion of an imperialist judiciary that seeks to enhance its own sway over the sovereignty of The People regardless of the leanings of any individual district court judge.

PrintSmith wrote: You've given a perfect overview of why the Biden administration was such an abysmal, wasteful, enterprise. A group of people seeking a way to implement their identity political policies for political profit regardless of the end results on the economy or foreign policy. That's why Trump has so much work ahead of his administration to remove all the cancerous tendrils infecting the executive branch. I don't have to wait & watch, the entire Union lived through that nightmare for the last 4 years.

[/b]

AND THE NEXT 3 1/2 YEARS WILL PRODUCE THE FINAL RESULTS OF ''THE FOURTH TURNING',
THE CONSTITUTION WILL BE OBSOLETE OR WE WILL EMERGE AS A RESPECTED ,STRONG,
EXAMPLE OF A RESILIENT NATION, THAT THE WORLD WOULD WANT TO EMULATE.....THE TRIAL
BY FIRE OF OUR FOUNDING FATHERS FIGHT FOR LIBERTY......TATTERED,BUT INTACT. WAIT AND WATCH