- Posts: 30123
- Thank you received: 178
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
It was a lot less of a stretch when John Adams said that… I don’t think he would have ever imagined how corrupt and worthless the parties would become.Freezeman wrote: Calling the Democratic and Republican parties two great parties is a stretch as well.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I'm guessing that Adams was using the term in the sense of "large" instead of "excellent" . . .Freezeman wrote: Calling the Democratic and Republican parties two great parties is a stretch as well.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
There is a reason there are two major parties . . . there are two basic theories of central governance. One belief is that to maximize individual liberties the central government must be kept small and have limited powers. The other theory is that the central government is a powerful entity and it is something to be served by the individuals and society it oversees.Rick wrote: But again, what would a “viable” party look like? Would it be a party that would be seen as “moderate”… one that satisfies people with no principles?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.