Are members of the Tea Party more angry or more gullible?

09 Sep 2010 16:15 #21 by Scruffy

HEARTLESS wrote: Just spits, okay this is getting out of control.


lol

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Sep 2010 16:40 #22 by Blazer Bob

Vice Lord wrote:

Nmysys wrote: She can't right now, she is working 50 hours a week!!!!

You decide Wayne, are we ANGRRRRRRRY or just gullible?

You can paint things your way all you like, but the truth is we are angry at what people like you will allow our government to get away with and keep on defending it!!!!!!!! Most rational Democrats are refutsing to be part of what Obama is doing, because they can see the anger growing in this country.



Hey Einstien, how come you wern't angry when Bush emptied the treasury and put our kids in debt forever...? Where were you then- Nothing like closing the barn door after the horses have bolted.


They were angry. That is why they stayed home and let the d's take control.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Sep 2010 17:08 #23 by Spykster

HEARTLESS wrote: Oh Lazy&Jaded (someone keeps moving these keys around), having a discussion with you is only slightly better than listening to my boxers fart.

rofllol

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Sep 2010 17:11 #24 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic Are members of the Tea Party more angry or more gullible?

neptunechimney wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:

Nmysys wrote: She can't right now, she is working 50 hours a week!!!!

You decide Wayne, are we ANGRRRRRRRY or just gullible?

You can paint things your way all you like, but the truth is we are angry at what people like you will allow our government to get away with and keep on defending it!!!!!!!! Most rational Democrats are refutsing to be part of what Obama is doing, because they can see the anger growing in this country.



Hey Einstien, how come you wern't angry when Bush emptied the treasury and put our kids in debt forever...? Where were you then- Nothing like closing the barn door after the horses have bolted.


They were angry. That is why they stayed home and let the d's take control.


That theory doesn't hold water..More people voted oin the last election than ever before...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Sep 2010 17:14 #25 by Grady

Vice Lord wrote:

neptunechimney wrote:

Vice Lord wrote:

Nmysys wrote: She can't right now, she is working 50 hours a week!!!!

You decide Wayne, are we ANGRRRRRRRY or just gullible?

You can paint things your way all you like, but the truth is we are angry at what people like you will allow our government to get away with and keep on defending it!!!!!!!! Most rational Democrats are refutsing to be part of what Obama is doing, because they can see the anger growing in this country.



Hey Einstien, how come you wern't angry when Bush emptied the treasury and put our kids in debt forever...? Where were you then- Nothing like closing the barn door after the horses have bolted.


They were angry. That is why they stayed home and let the d's take control.


That theory doesn't hold water..More people voted oin the last election than ever before...

Sheeple :Koolaid: drinkers

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Sep 2010 17:21 - 10 Sep 2010 17:03 #26 by Spykster
It's incredible that a few are so much in the dark that they don't realize how small their minority is in this country's political landscape. The deplorable actions of " Barry O. and the MoonBat Wrecking Crew Review " have turned an ever increasing majority of this country off, and this will not be forgotten for a very long time. Bush stunk it up, but Barry O is pure evil. BTW...Barry O gave his blessing to Bush's stimulus, and then compounded this once great nation's misery by instituting his own disastrous one, and wants yet another. 600 BILLION in new taxes in the MessiahMed fiasco, and the CBO has gone on record as saying they were deliberately misled by the casa blanca by being given misleading data when they tried to cost factor that monstrosity. But some of you...just don't get it. Maybe you just don't know how to add and subtract...Not one DemonCrat who voted for MessiahMed, who is running for re-election is raising that one very important (negative) sales pitch in their campaigns. Have any of you high and mighty sorts figured out why? :Whistle :loser:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Sep 2010 23:02 #27 by FredHayek
Are TEA party faithful more gullible than the independents who bought into hope and change?
Iraq war end? Nope, still 50,000 troops in support roles and taking casualties.
Afghanistan, increased casualties and more territory claimed by the Taliban.
Economy, continuing malaise, people unemployed for many months.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

10 Sep 2010 17:15 #28 by Spykster

SS109 wrote: Are TEA party faithful more gullible than the independents who bought into hope and change?
Iraq war end? Nope, still 50,000 troops in support roles and taking casualties.
Afghanistan, increased casualties and more territory claimed by the Taliban.
Economy, continuing malaise, people unemployed for many months.

Angrier by the minute...I disagree with one of your points --- Afghanistan --- a large part of the problem is it is too politicized, like a good many of the wars we were in since WW2. Our military has too many constraints on it. There is an increase in casualties because the fighting is increasing. That is to be expected. In WW2, we were losing 12,000 KIA per week by the war's end. Obviously, we will never see those losses again. Also, 33,000 people died in auto accidents in this country last year. Statisitcally, it is probably safer to be on the ground in Afghanistan than it is to drive in this country. We haver a large number of special forces units wreaking havoc on the taliban,etal, in Afghanistan in the evening, and when asked about the casualties inflicted on the insurgents, they were said to be substantial. I think we are really not too concerned about the territory issues in some areas. It seems like we let them fill up what becomes a "target rich environment", and then we go to work ,and kill a lot of them at night - a lot more than in day ops. Just look at the Predator,Apache,C-130,etc gun cam footage on the 'net. They can't hide. We can also identify our troops on the ground as well. Anyway, one thing the Great Deciever, Barry O, forgot to mention is that we have 3,500 - 4,500 Special Ops. troops on the ground in Iraq still fighting...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.172 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+