- Posts: 6722
- Thank you received: 72
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
LadyJazzer wrote: Yes, and I am pro-Social Security, pro-Medicare, pro-Medicaid, pro-health-care-reform, which makes me anti-TEA Party, too..
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Reducing the size of government is a major theme among Tea Party members, but if you want to reduce the size of government, how easy is it to make that happen, and if you make it happen, do you think you've solved a problem, or created a new one? After all
Ask a politician: Where would you cut? The pat answer: Waste, fraud and abuse. Both parties give you that line. Waste, fraud and abuse. Okay, now what about real cuts? Cuts on big things? Cuts on programs that will really reduce the size of government.
Is there waste, fraud and abuse? Sure. Enough to balance a budget or reduce the size of government to some size based one someone's idea of a Constitutional metric? Do we even know what we mean by "small government"? How small? How big do we not want it? What programs, what departments, what agencies do we unload? And how much do you actually think that's going to reduce the government?
Before you answer that question, keep this in mind: 43 percent of the federal budget goes to just three guaranteed benefit programs: Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (which is health care for the poor). Shall we cut those? Go through that NY Times poll profiling Tea Party members (with both some surprising results and some level of vindication for Tea Party members), and you'll find that the majority of tea partiers like their Social Security and their Medicare.
If the majority of Tea Party senior citizens like their Social Security and Medicare, how many politicians will you find willing to risk their careers by suggesting we cut those programs, or increase the retirement age or introduce litmus tests for Social Security benefits?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Nmysys wrote: What does Pro Social Security have to do with anything? I'm on Social Security and in the Tea Party.
LJ you are against everything you don't understand including the Tea Party. You should come to our meeting and find out for yourself instead of closing your mind off to everything. You are welcome, we won't bite or argue with you. Maybe that is the reason. You would rather argue.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Wayne Harrison wrote: I prefer, "I paid more in than I'm getting back for mine. Kids should fund their own 401K and forget about Social Security."
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Wayne Harrison wrote:
Reducing the size of government is a major theme among Tea Party members, but if you want to reduce the size of government, how easy is it to make that happen, and if you make it happen, do you think you've solved a problem, or created a new one? After all
Ask a politician: Where would you cut? The pat answer: Waste, fraud and abuse. Both parties give you that line. Waste, fraud and abuse. Okay, now what about real cuts? Cuts on big things? Cuts on programs that will really reduce the size of government.
Is there waste, fraud and abuse? Sure. Enough to balance a budget or reduce the size of government to some size based one someone's idea of a Constitutional metric? Do we even know what we mean by "small government"? How small? How big do we not want it? What programs, what departments, what agencies do we unload? And how much do you actually think that's going to reduce the government?
Before you answer that question, keep this in mind: 43 percent of the federal budget goes to just three guaranteed benefit programs: Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid (which is health care for the poor). Shall we cut those? Go through that NY Times poll profiling Tea Party members (with both some surprising results and some level of vindication for Tea Party members), and you'll find that the majority of tea partiers like their Social Security and their Medicare.
If the majority of Tea Party senior citizens like their Social Security and Medicare, how many politicians will you find willing to risk their careers by suggesting we cut those programs, or increase the retirement age or introduce litmus tests for Social Security benefits?
http://www.examiner.com/populist-in-nat ... government
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.