Court records say she challenged the fees only when the bank sued her in November 2008 to collect $78,457 on her overdrawn account, a figure that included the overdraft fees.
Cavett argued the fees were "unconscionable" and said they would be considered much too high if they were figured as interest payments on borrowed money.
The bank sued her in November 2008 to collect $78,457, the court upheld $12,000. Maybe she should consider herself lucky?
And lastly, the overdraft fees occured over a four and half year period. She didn't notice at the time?
