Pelosi to Fly Southwest

But now TSA must have shoulder length large animal vet. gloves available if Nancy flies.

Well, if Boner continues to fly commercial airlines, they will still need the vet gloves to make sure the spray tan doesn't rub off on the TSA employees.

So the Sgt at arms requested the larger plane, wink, wink, nudge, nudge?

I know I am a cynical man but I did see the bills for her cross country flights and if she didn't fly as much as she had planned, I am guessing it is because the original story came out.

Nothing like an informed public to hold their goverment employees feet to the fire.

And remember the British Prime Minister flies commercial.

Well, if you have evidence contrary to the factcheck.org article, I'd like to see it.

I don't care if you are a Republican or a Democrat or Tea Party or ... , it is NOT responsible to be operating large equipment such as B757 or equivalent for just carting YOUR butt around the skies.

Republicans better learn this as well. FOLKS ARE FED UP with the waste. PERIOD!

Wow... It's a good thing it's not true, isn't it??? 757??

rofllol rofllol

AV8OR wrote: I don't care if you are a Republican or a Democrat or Tea Party or ... , it is NOT responsible to be operating large equipment such as B757 or equivalent for just carting YOUR butt around the skies.

Republicans better learn this as well. FOLKS ARE FED UP with the waste. PERIOD!

I posted earlier that this particular story about Pelosi and her huge jet is untrue. You can check it out yourself at the factcheck.org website I listed in an earlier post. If you have evidence to the contrary, please share it with all of us.

AV8OR wrote: I don't care if you are a Republican or a Democrat or Tea Party or ... , it is NOT responsible to be operating large equipment such as B757 or equivalent for just carting YOUR butt around the skies.

Republicans better learn this as well. FOLKS ARE FED UP with the waste. PERIOD!

Read the message (the Steak) and stop getting caught up in the Peas...

Yeah, Scruffy... "We don' care 'bout no truth.... We done read it on the Internets."

:VeryScared:

Scruffy wrote: Well, if you have evidence contrary to the factcheck.org article, I'd like to see it.

The Snopes really only talks about 2007-2008, and I don't know enough about factcheck.org to trust it yet. I know Snopes is a little slanted left.