Palin: Stand by North Korea

jf1acai wrote:

ckm8 wrote: No one on the right cares. They just want President Obama out and if putting this freak show in is the way to do it that's exactly what they'll do. They've shown that their party trumps their country every single time.

Please provide proof of this statement, or else admit that you are full of sh*t.

I don't know about wanting to put Palin in as his replacement, but there is this statement from the Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell.

http://articles.latimes.com/2010/oct/27 ... l-20101027

If Republicans are to enjoy a midterm triumph in 2010 as they did in 1994, McConnell said his party should say: "Those of you who helped make this a good day, you need to go out and help us finish the job."

Asked what that "job" was, McConnell explained that "the single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president."

Scruffy beat me to it. The party leaders have declared that more important than creating jobs, more important than recovering our economy, more important than dealing with security issues overseas is defeating President Obama. I know that seems unremarkable to you as you share his ideology, but to the rest of us an elected official declaring that anything comes before the good governance of our nation is shocking and borders on the traitorous.

I am unaware that either ckm8 or McConnell speaks for everyone on the right.

Since it is obvious that neither does, and that one who states such sweeping generalizations as if they were fact is, in fact full of sh*t, why do some persist in such stupidity?

McConnell is the minority leader in the Senate, so I'm assuming he speaks for the Senate Republicans.

I haven't been on here very long but I have read quite a number of posters who make sweeping generalizations. Unless you call everyone on it, trying to call one person on it is unfair, IMO.

Would that be like sweeping generalizations that "Everyone on the Left 'hates this country'?"...or: "Everyone on the Left are socialists?" or "Everyone on the Left are atheists?", ad nauseum...

Does that mean that one who states such sweeping generalizations as if they were fact is, in fact, full of sh*t? And, why do some persist in such stupidity?

May be unfair, but it is factual, which his statement is not.

And IMO it applies to everyone who makes such ridiculous generalizations.

As I said before, but was trying to be a bit nicer about it - <!-- l --><a class="postlink-local" href=" 285bound.com/Forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5849&start=10 " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=6&t=5849&start=10<!-- l -->

No, it is not factual... Therefore, you are a liar.

No, it is not factual... Therefore, you are a liar.

You are full of sh*t.

Now that the insults are out of the way, is there any productive discussion?

Apparently not... But feel free to continue with your silly generalizations...