Oops! Dept. of Homeland Security Shuts down 84,000 sites!

You and your Huffngton Post friends are outraged...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/02/1 ... 24145.html

I have never in my life visited the Huggington post site. But what has that to do with government employees not having the knowledge or skills to do their jobs?

Back in the 70s the Bureau of Tobacco and Alcohol was also given the task to oversee firearms in the U.S. Immediately they started no-knock raids on gun runners. Problem was they broke into the wrong homes and killed the homeowners whenever they tried to defend themselves. The new BTAF were a bunch of baffoons who killed innocent citizens because of their inconpetence.

But you most probably think that was OK.

Thank you for the link.

kresspin, the U.S. government conducted LSD experimentation upon unknowing citizens. Some of those victims committed suicide.
But you are OK with that.

major bean wrote: I have never in my life visited the Huggington post site. But what has that to do with government employees not having the knowledge or skills to do their jobs?

Back in the 70s the Bureau of Tobacco and Alcohol was also given the task to oversee firearms in the U.S. Immediately they started no-knock raids on gun runners. Problem was they broke into the wrong homes and killed the homeowners whenever they tried to defend themselves. The new BTAF were a bunch of baffoons who killed innocent citizens because of their inconpetence.

But you most probably think that was OK.

Well, you and the lefties at Huffpo are on the same track regarding this... That should tell you something.

If we're going to talk about government employees not having the knowledge or skills to do their jobs, we're going to be here for years....

And quit pulling your strawman arguments about LSD and syphilis experiments...and attribute things I never said to me. i haven't stated an opinion on either.

Do you mean to say that you cannot think in a straight line? That your reasoning criteria changes with the wind?

Also, if someone on the left/right happens to say something reasonable, then I am with them on it. If they say something that is not reasonable, then I am contrary to it. I hope that you would do the same. But that is only a hope.

major bean wrote: Do you mean to say that you cannot think in a straight line? That your reasoning criteria changes with the wind?

There you go again...

(with apologies to Ronald Regan)

No, I don't mean to say that.

You have given very good demonstration that your reasoning wafts with the breeze.

Oh, I'm so hurt by that cause I really care about what your opinion of me is.

I have stated ONE opinion about ONE incident. If you get "wafting" out of that, your intelligence is wafting out of your ass.

There is no attempt to "hurt" you. Only try to get you to reason with consistency.

So, you think that it is OK for the gov't to hurt or destroy those associated with 84,000 sites unnecessarily to accomplish their goal of shutting down illegal porn sites? Do you think that the lack of skill of the government employees is excusable?

Do you think that it is OK to execute people falsely convicted of a crime in order to execute those who are guilty? That is the very same reasoning that you are using in this case.