Mich. Democrats Indicted on Forgery and Perjury Charges

18 Mar 2011 04:56 #1 by outdoor338
Mich. Democrats Indicted on Forgery and Perjury Charges for lying about tea party

http://www.aolnews.com/2011/03/17/mich- ... ges-video/

You just can't make this stuff up, who knew!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Mar 2011 07:26 #2 by Rick
Cue the crickets.......

I haven't seen this on the MSM so it must be false...right?

It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy

George Orwell

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Mar 2011 08:33 #3 by Nmysys
What is it that one Liberal on here says, oh yeah, The End Justifies The Means!!!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Mar 2011 09:06 #4 by kresspin
What hasn't been mentioned yet is that people would actually VOTE for the non-candidates who weren't running and had not expressed a position... that they would actually VOTE for them just because they had the word Tea Party attached to their names, without knowing anything about them.

If people vote for a candidate blindly -- based on party affiliation alone -- they get what they deserve.

http://detnews.com/article/20110317/MET ... rty-scheme


<head shaking>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Mar 2011 09:56 #5 by Nmysys

What hasn't been mentioned yet is that people would actually VOTE for the non-candidates who weren't running and had not expressed a position... that they would actually VOTE for them just because they had the word Tea Party attached to their names, without knowing anything about them.

If people vote for a candidate blindly -- based on party affiliation alone -- they get what they deserve.


Can't that be said also for a ( D ) or an ( R )?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Mar 2011 11:07 #6 by kresspin
Sure. although the (D)'s and the (R)'s are usually out campaigning, so there's some sense that they are actual candidates... in this case, they weren't and the plan was contingent upon sheeple voting for the (TP) candidates blindly.

That's why I said if people vote for a candidate blindly -- based on party affiliation alone -- they get what they deserve.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Mar 2011 11:34 #7 by PrintSmith

kresspin wrote: If people vote for a candidate blindly -- based on party affiliation alone -- they get what they deserve.

I agree with that, party over person is generally a recipe for disaster, especially when the motivation is to vote against a person based upon current dissatisfaction with their party by casting a vote for the member of the opposition party.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Mar 2011 11:46 #8 by kresspin
Which is partly how Obama got elected.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Mar 2011 14:23 #9 by PrintSmith
Not just Obama kresspin, it also explains Wilson, FDR, Nixon, Carter, Reagan and Clinton as well as majorities given to a single party in Congress during some of those administrations, supermajorities in some cases.

Really what we need to decide as a nation is whether or not we wish to have power concentrated into a single governmental entity as every other failed empire has done in the past or return to the multiple levels of limited power that was originally established as the means of protecting individual liberty. That is the fundamental question that we need to answer and then express in the voting booth. It isn't about who loves unions, or who loves corporations - the fundamental problem at this point is who wants one government in control of most everything and who wants each level of government in control of only a fraction of it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 Mar 2011 14:49 #10 by Rick

It was always the women, and above all the young ones, who were the most bigoted adherents of the Party, the swallowers of slogans, the amateur spies and nosers−out of unorthodoxy

George Orwell

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.167 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+