- Posts: 15745
- Thank you received: 320
I agree. Yes, they should've made a public announcement that they had a ringworm outbreak, but I do not think that just because they didn't that it means anything sinister, that they are "circling the wagons" and not being transparent. The outbreak was recognized, and they immediately started dealing with it the way that they said they would - by isolating and treating the animals, not euthanizing them. The lack of communication was an unfortunate series of events in that their shelter director has just started and didn't know anything about the history of what had occurred and why it was so critical that this sensitive issue be made public sooner than it was, and no one else picked up the slack when they should have. They made a mistake, not a deliberate attempt to hide anything, but a mistake.MsMAM wrote: That is what I wondered as well? HA - above said something too? Is it pertinent that they post here that animals come in with ring worm? I would have been torked if they had also put the animals down like the old regime, but they didn't. They just handled it. Do I need to know every time they make a run to spay and neuter? I know that ring worm is a sensitive issue, but I happen to know there are all kinds of things they do to the animals to assist them with special medical needs. Frankly - *I* was amazed the old board member brought that up. IMHO - it was just a reminder that *they* euthanized those animals. This board did nothing of the kind. They handled it.
Also, it may be that the community tried to rely on these sites as all of those means of communication etc., but that does mean that it is the responsibility of IMHS to use those as a means of communication? IMHO - Frankly - no. I only read the thread on PC since it does involve IMHS - as you all know my feelings pretty well about PC. My point is those folks spend TONS of hours per day helping those babies find homes and caring for them. I can't see them having the time to also make sure they spend tons of time posting on these forums. As I stated - go talk to them (the royal you). Go to the shelter. Help them. You will get all of the information you need. Steve said on TV, anyone is welcome to go look at what they found. If you do, I think a good bunch of you will feel as I do - the DA *should* have pursued this issue.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
CinnamonGirl wrote: I thought it was posted on the sites.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
CinnamonGirl wrote: But I thought I saw it posted here
<!-- l --><a class="postlink-local" href=" www.285bound.com/Forums/viewtopic.php?f=145&t=16126 " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=145&t=16126<!-- l -->
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
CinnamonGirl wrote: <snip>The difference in my view is that if the board posts after the fact they euthanized animals without asking for help is a big difference from this ringworm issue. <snip> It is not easy. Why would we not give them the benefit of doubt. I have not seen anything to think otherwise.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
MsMAM wrote:
CinnamonGirl wrote:
TPP wrote:
CinnamonGirl wrote: TPP, I disagree.
That's Cool, (still like ya), that's what this is all about correct?
I just don't know what you are saying the new board did.
That is what I wondered as well? HA - above said something too? Is it pertinent that they post here that animals come in with ring worm? I would have been torked if they had also put the animals down like the old regime, but they didn't. They just handled it. Do I need to know every time they make a run to spay and neuter? I know that ring worm is a sensitive issue, but I happen to know there are all kinds of things they do to the animals to assist them with special medical needs. Frankly - *I* was amazed the old board member brought that up. IMHO - it was just a reminder that *they* euthanized those animals. This board did nothing of the kind. They handled it.
Also, it may be that the community tried to rely on these sites as all of those means of communication etc., but that does mean that it is the responsibility of IMHS to use those as a means of communication? IMHO - Frankly - no. I only read the thread on PC since it does involve IMHS - as you all know my feelings pretty well about PC. My point is those folks spend TONS of hours per day helping those babies find homes and caring for them. I can't see them having the time to also make sure they spend tons of time posting on these forums. As I stated - go talk to them (the royal you). Go to the shelter. Help them. You will get all of the information you need. Steve said on TV, anyone is welcome to go look at what they found. If you do, I think a good bunch of you will feel as I do - the DA *should* have pursued this issue.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.