How are Burland Ponds, Deer Creek and NFSP River?

13 Sep 2013 09:08 #1 by Venturer
How are Burland Ponds, also Deer Creek and NFSP River in Bailey?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2013 09:49 #2 by ScienceChic
Haven't heard anything on the scanner about them. Anyone else?

"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther

The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2013 11:27 #3 by pacamom
Deer Creek was close but not over 285 at midnight last night. Per a friends post on FB

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2013 12:13 #4 by Mtn Gramma
Ponds were normal yesterday when I was fishing.

Anyone heard anything about Tiny Town?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2013 13:28 #5 by FOS
The scanners for Park County and Conifer are quiet with the exception of an occasional medical call

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2013 18:54 #6 by Mtn Gramma
We were at the ponds again today. They're normal, but Deer Creek is crazy high and fast!

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2013 19:28 #7 by UNDER MODERATION
Replied by UNDER MODERATION on topic How are Burland Ponds, Deer Creek and NFSP River?
The water in the deer creek is currently moving at about 1 6/8 feet per second

No fish seen, I think they've all been washed down the river

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

13 Sep 2013 19:42 #8 by jf1acai

VL wrote: The water in the deer creek is currently moving at about 1 6/8 feet per second


Is that similar to 1.75 feet per second? And when did water flow rate begin to be measured in feet per second, rather than cubic feet per second? Or were you measuring the time it took for your toy boat to move downstream?

Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley

Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

14 Sep 2013 08:31 #9 by Venturer

Mtn Gramma wrote: We were at the ponds again today. They're normal, but Deer Creek is crazy high and fast!


Thanks for the update.

Drove by Deer Creek along 285 but never made it to the ponds.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

16 Sep 2013 16:41 #10 by Venturer
Drove by Burland Ponds. They are full. Deer Creek is running high. I think that the road will get inundated before there would be any problems with the ponds. Looks like water is backing up by the white house.

Took a drive up PC43 and saw how much water has backed up in different areas. Doesn't look like ParkCo R&B are doing anything to open the plugged ones that they are responsible for. Hope we don't get any more cells hanging over the area.

Neighbor says Deer Creek is massive on its way to the North Fork of the South Platte in the National Forest. Quite a hike I understand and I haven't seen it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.143 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+