× News, results, speculation, and bragging! Home of the popular Pick 5 Contest ! RATING: PG

Buying into the Packers

25 Nov 2011 13:18 #21 by Photo-fish
Replied by Photo-fish on topic Buying into the Packers
11 & 0
:woo hoo: :woo hoo:

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Dec 2011 11:47 #22 by Photo-fish
Replied by Photo-fish on topic Buying into the Packers
I know what you're thinking. "Did he send six wideouts or only five?" Well, to tell you the truth, in all this excitement I kind of lost track myself. But being as this is a .44 Rodgers, the most powerful throwing arm in the world, and would take your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question: Do I run the dime package? Well, do ya, punk?

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Dec 2011 11:49 #23 by CinnamonGirl
Replied by CinnamonGirl on topic Buying into the Packers
That is why they are using the spread offense. It is working.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Dec 2011 11:54 #24 by CinnamonGirl
Replied by CinnamonGirl on topic Buying into the Packers
I would rather eat glass chips than own part of the Pack.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Dec 2011 11:56 #25 by Photo-fish
Replied by Photo-fish on topic Buying into the Packers
Go for it. I bet they would go down easily covered in Real Wisconsin Cheese!!

I heard Outdoor, Viking and VL are each buying 10 shares.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Dec 2011 12:29 #26 by FredHayek
Replied by FredHayek on topic Buying into the Packers
Those Giants almost stole that game. But it might be smart for the Pack to throw one game to take the pressure off.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Dec 2011 12:42 #27 by Photo-fish
Replied by Photo-fish on topic Buying into the Packers

FredHayek wrote: Those Giants almost stole that game. But it might be smart for the Pack to throw one game to take the pressure off.


:yeahthat: Any team with a playoff chance against the Packers should watch that game. I don't know about 'throwing' a game. Maybe just pulling the first string for a bit. Their pass defense was lacking for sure.

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Dec 2011 13:47 #28 by znovkovic
Replied by znovkovic on topic Buying into the Packers
Yeah almost but no cigar! I guess from my end it is exciting to see if a team in this day and age can beat the '72 Dolphins? I was eager to see the Patriots a few years back almost get it done but also no cigar.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Dec 2011 14:30 #29 by Martin Ent Inc
Bill Clinton has the Cigar.

But I don't think the Pack will go undefeated.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

05 Dec 2011 14:50 #30 by Photo-fish
Replied by Photo-fish on topic Buying into the Packers

Martin Ent Inc wrote: But I don't think the Pack will go undefeated.


Which one(s) of the remaining?

Oakland
@ KC
Chicago
Detroit

´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`´¯`•...¸><((((º>´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•´¯`•...¸><((((º> ´¯`•.. ><((((º>`•.´¯`•...¸><((((º>

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.174 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+