Eleventh Judicial District Attorney Thom LeDoux said he will not be filing charges connected with a Dec. 27 party hosted by sheriff's deputies where a minor was intoxicated. LeDoux said he had found insufficient evidence that a law was broken at the party. A redacted version of the internal affairs investigation report from the Park County Sheriff's Office is on The Flume's Web site. Details in this week's Flume.
What the "MINOR" wasn't DRUNK ENOUGH?? Either she was DRUNK or not, really it's NOT that tough to figure it out.. AMAZING Now I suppose everybody will be allowing "Drunk Minors" at their parties....
To whitewash is a metaphor meaning to gloss over or cover up vices, crimes or scandals or to exonerate by means of a perfunctory investigation or through biased presentation of data.[1] It is especially used in the context of corporations, governments or other organizations.
Manna Pro wrote: Monday morning QB's that don't know the law nor did they participated in the investigation. By damn, something awful happened & I'm going to complain.
How many of the complainers drank as minors or allowed their own child to have a drink?
I think that you are confused. It's not the lack of finding that people are upset about, its the obvious double standard that exists. If you don't think this getting tossed out is a bunch of BS, then you don't know anything about this case. (I guess there is one other possibility.)
Can you provide examples where someone has been charged with a felon, taken to jail and convicted of said felon for less than an officer witnessing a minor intoxicated at a party? Doubtful, I think your just drumming up BS without any facts.
towermonkey wrote: If you don't think this getting tossed out is a bunch of BS, then you don't know anything about this case. (I guess there is one other possibility.)
what do you know about the case that is not printed in the Flume or available via the investigation report?