CPL HARDEY an EMBARASSMENT...

AV8OR wrote:
Of course, does this deflect from a deeper incident that may have happened at the party? A former SRO is going to start feeling left out.

I know you want him to be guilty of more than that, but do you really think something "deeper" could happen and not be reported along with the drinking? Is that just speculation on your part? IMO, what happened was bad enough. It's apparently not a crime, but maybe it should be if a law officer is involved. Throwing other unfounded accusations around deflects from the seriousness of the reality and undermines the discussion.

_________________
4evr - There was no electioneering. There was no $400,000 a month. There are no 719 missing votes. Taking somebody else's work without permission is a form of theft. Inability to tell private editorial content from a state statute is a disabling character flaw.
Admit it all and you'll feel better.

ColoradoXprss wrote:

noneya BIZ wrote: As Mamarama said: (warning) Park County, Corruption in Progress... I guess I have to ask CX.. Has there really been MANY that haven't broke the PCSO Policies and Procedures?? :shots: (i had to add that just because i like it)

I would imagine one would have to ask the "experts" who have been or are currently still in thePCSOs employ?
:thumbsup:

Becky wrote: Thank CG for the link....

AV8OR wrote:
Of course, does this deflect from a deeper incident that may have happened at the party? A former SRO is going to start feeling left out.

I know you want him to be guilty of more than that, but do you really think something "deeper" could happen and not be reported along with the drinking? Is that just speculation on your part? IMO, what happened was bad enough. It's apparently not a crime, but maybe it should be if a law officer is involved. Throwing other unfounded accusations around deflects from the seriousness of the reality and undermines the discussion.

_________________
4evr - There was no electioneering. There was no $400,000 a month. There are no 719 missing votes. Taking somebody else's work without permission is a form of theft. Inability to tell private editorial content from a state statute is a disabling character flaw.
Admit it all and you'll feel better.

Once again.....***** ** **** ***?

MamaRama wrote: Hey CX, are there REALLY experts in the PCSO?? who I ask, who?? :VeryScared:

youngfogey wrote:

Becky wrote: Thank CG for the link....

AV8OR wrote:
Of course, does this deflect from a deeper incident that may have happened at the party? A former SRO is going to start feeling left out.

I know you want him to be guilty of more than that, but do you really think something "deeper" could happen and not be reported along with the drinking? Is that just speculation on your part? IMO, what happened was bad enough. It's apparently not a crime, but maybe it should be if a law officer is involved. Throwing other unfounded accusations around deflects from the seriousness of the reality and undermines the discussion.

_________________
4evr - There was no electioneering. There was no $400,000 a month. There are no 719 missing votes. Taking somebody else's work without permission is a form of theft. Inability to tell private editorial content from a state statute is a disabling character flaw.
Admit it all and you'll feel better.

Once again.....***** ** **** ***?

There you go again, breaking all the rules you insist others follow. And once again - you can't read? I'm glad you're living up to your reputation, Becky. At first I thought all those people were exaggerating about you. Clearly not. You just make things up out of thin air on a regular basis. Pathetic AND ignorant.

You are obviously taken completely by surprise by the insertion of the odd expression of sanity and logic.