Eliot Spitzer and CNN Sr. Legal Analyst Jeffrey Toobin look at discrepancies by possible GOP pres. candidate Donald Trump in a deposition for a libel case.
TRUMP: I have 2 1/2 miles on the ocean which is more than any other course. Every hole either is on the ocean or faces the ocean, and it's great. And in addition to that, I'm building 75 great mansions over the top of the golf course. So it's a very exciting project.
(END OF VIDEO CLIP)
SPITZER: Earlier today, we called the sales office at the Trump National Golf Club Los Angeles. How many of those 75 mansions have been built? Five years later, six. And no more are under construction. And how many have been sold? Three.
But here's the thing, in 2003, Trump valued the property at $30 million. In 2005, he valued it at $360 million. Why? Because of the 75 mansions, but only six of them are there.
So that discrepancy in valuation, Jeff, that's a big number, and arguably a big problem.
There are other examples, as well, in the CNN article. Yeah, he'll be a GREAT Tea Party candidate to deal with our financial problems. :Whistle
lol He is born to be a politician, promising stuff and not delivering.
BTW, the old guard Republicans, like Rove, hate the idea of a Trump presidency. First of all, he is his own man, he used to support the single payer system, and he wouldn't be in their pockets like "W" was.
Personally I haven't made up my mind about the Donald. I am guessing he won't even run. He would lose too much air time.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
SS109 wrote: lol He is born to be a politician, promising stuff and not delivering.
Or a car salesman.
It's sad that he's even being considered as a presidential candidate, especially after he's said he would go in and steal oil fields from other countries using military force. His answer to rising gas prices.
Or imagine if we elected a community organizer! Someone with little to NO executive experience. Someone who has never had to really balance a large budget. Insane don't you think?
If only my liberal friends and the media applied the same level of scrutiny and standards to the current President that they did to previous Presidents or ANY other conservative candidate. It would be a dream come true don't you think? :VeryScared:
lionshead2010 wrote: Or imagine if we elected a community organizer! Someone with little to NO executive experience. Someone who has never had to really balance a large budget. Insane don't you think?
If only my liberal friends and the media applied the same level of scrutiny and standards to the current President that they did to previous Presidents or ANY other conservative candidate. It would be a dream come true don't you think? :VeryScared:
rofllol Great point. If the election was held today, I would vote for Trump over Barack. Trump still has more executive experience, has more experience hiring the right people and knows what makes an economy run. Obama only knows to throw money at a problem, and the US doesn't have any more to throw.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
It's sad that he's even being considered as a presidential candidate, especially after he's said he would go in and steal oil fields from other countries using military force. His answer to rising gas prices.
That's not what the United States stands for.
Anybody running against your Obamamaniac is scary to you, not sad.
What does the U.S. stand for to you? Entitlement, destruction of our economy, lying about everything,
Socialism, not doing anything that you promise??
You think Trump is better than Obama? He's a lying, cheating, amoral egomaniac. The fact that some in the Republican party would settle for a low life like this sickens me. You don't care about our country, you just care about "winning". repulsive. If this is the best we conservatives have to offer we are obviously morally bankrupt.
It's sad that he's even being considered as a presidential candidate, especially after he's said he would go in and steal oil fields from other countries using military force. His answer to rising gas prices.
That's not what the United States stands for.
What does the U.S. stand for to you?
It stands for not invading other countries and seizing their oil fields by military force.
It stands for not invading other countries and seizing their oil fields by military force.
It used to also stand for not torturing people.
What Oil Fields have we taken by force? If that were true, I think we would have seen the price a little differently at the gas pump back when you think we did that. You forgot the old argument about Lying about WMDs!!
Do you agree with Obama about bombing Libya?
What is torture to you? Waterboarding the enemy to try to save American lives!!! All of our troops have gone through worse just in basic training. Oh, I forgot, some woman in the Army embarrassed the enemy. Poor enemy.
I HAVE NOT CONSIDERED VOTING FOR DONALD TRUMP, but just like when John McCain picked Sarah Palin, you on the left started demonizing her, because YOU ARE AFRAID OF HER> She is everything that you all stood for until she was picked by the Right!