If you are wondering why some folks are starting to question whether a college education is worth the cost, the video below goes a long way towards explaining it. Recently, the University of Missouri-St. Louis (UMSL) and the University of Missouri-Kansas City (UMKC) sponsored two college courses: Introduction to Labor Studies and Labor Politics and Society, to be taught simultaneously through a video conference between to two campuses.
The Professors are Judy Ancel, Director of Labor Studies at UMKC and Don Giljum, business manager for the International Union of Operating Engineers at Ameren UE in St. Louis. (Bonus: he is a member of the Communist Party.)
In the class, the Professors not only advocate the occasional need for violence and industrial sabotage, they outline specific tactics that can be used. As one of our colleagues pointed out, its the matter-of-factness of it all that is so disturbing.
And yes, the schools, and the professors’ salaries, are funded by taxpayers.
When is the last time you have heard a conservative college professor, incite his students to use sabotage or violence at a protest? I see by your reaction to the story, that you live and promote violence taught by liberal college professors, nice kresspin! :VeryScared:
kresspin.."up your butt" nice response..you think free speech means that this liberal professor can teach his students to incite violence at protests, and you have no problem with it! You're spinning on me here...do you remember the free speech issue when the back panthers had clubs, and threatened people going in to vote, how was that free speech for you? Did you complain about that?
Then you support this kind of speech kresspin, this is what your liberal college proff is teaching? This is the same kind of speech hitler promoted, hate, violence, and protests..your kind of guy!
[youtube:wx6n86js][/youtube:wx6n86js]
So you support college proffs teaching violence and hate in their class rooms? What other hate speech do you support if it benefits your liberal cause..just wondering?
I can't come to a conclusion on the video because it's highly edited (probably another Andrew Breietbart special) .... I'd like to know what he edited out and why. Other than that, it sounds like a college lecture and discussion about a particular subject:,
BTW, here's the video:
[youtube:2mm00u19][/youtube:2mm00u19]
Are you really against the First Amendment in the Constitution, Outdoor? I'm shocked you'd go against our founding fathers, being a Tea Partier and all.