Will Liberals Listen to Clinton?

towermonkey wrote: Morons

I wouldn't call them Morons. Just very unfocused!

CriticalBill wrote:

The Viking wrote:

CriticalBill wrote:

Kate wrote:

BearMtnHIB wrote: I see no liberals will discuss the issue-

You sure about that?

towermonkey wrote: CB, when have corporate taxes been lower than now?

LadyJazzer wrote: Effective Corporates rates haven't been this low since the 1950s...

AGAIN (wish you could read my lips), I didn't address the history of corporate tax rates, THE TOPIC IS BILL CLINTON'S OPINION!

Now would you like to be the first to address the topic or would like to wait for your delusional twin to deflect first? Do you think anyone in this administration will listen to Clinton or is his opinion and experience worth nothing to the Dems anymore?

Stop asking them to answer direct simple questions. It only confuses them! LJ is spinning right now trying to figure out how NOT to answer your initial quesiton!

I know, I know. I just figure there's one liberal out there who doesn't follow LJ around like a lost puppy, waiting for the command to speak up.

There actually are a few very intelligent liberals who can carry on a legitimate discusion and debate. Would be nice if they would post more on here.

towermonkey wrote:

“When I was president, we raised the corporate income-tax rates on corporations that made over $10 million [a year],” the former president told the Aspen Ideas Festival on Saturday evening.

“It made sense when I did it. It doesn’t make sense anymore — we’ve got an uncompetitive rate. We tax at 35 percent of income, although we only take about 23 percent. So we should cut the rate to 25 percent, or whatever’s competitive, and eliminate a lot of the deductions so that we still get a fair amount, and there’s not so much variance in what the corporations pay. But how can they do that by Aug. 2?”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/07 ... z1RGV8pGei

Sounds like he's actually endorsing raising the corporate rate by 2%.

Or whatever is competitive.

The Viking wrote: There actually are a few very intelligent liberals who can carry on a legitimate discusion and debate. Would be nice if they would post more on here.

You mean like the intelligent discussion we had this morning about the erroneous $278,000 per job figure? Yes, by all means, let's have intelligent discussions rather than outrages posted from blogs.

Kate wrote:

The Viking wrote: There actually are a few very intelligent liberals who can carry on a legitimate discusion and debate. Would be nice if they would post more on here.

You mean like the intelligent discussion we had this morning about the erroneous $278,000 per job figure? Yes, by all means, let's have intelligent discussions rather than outrages posted from blogs.

It is impossible to have "intelligent" discussions with these clowns. Buncha ditto heads.

And the question I asked you:

Will any conservatives listen to Alan Simpson?

Former Senator Alan Simpson Rails on Tax Protest Group

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,591603,00.html


Alan Simpson Rejects The GOP’s “No New Taxes” Orthodoxy

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/alan-s ... orthodoxy/

They listen to Homer.

LadyJazzer wrote: And the question I asked you:

Will any conservatives listen to Alan Simpson?

Former Senator Alan Simpson Rails on Tax Protest Group

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,591603,00.html


Alan Simpson Rejects The GOP’s “No New Taxes” Orthodoxy

http://www.outsidethebeltway.com/alan-s ... orthodoxy/

Is this deflection number 2, 3, or 4? So hard to keep track.

Kate wrote:

towermonkey wrote:

“When I was president, we raised the corporate income-tax rates on corporations that made over $10 million [a year],” the former president told the Aspen Ideas Festival on Saturday evening.

“It made sense when I did it. It doesn’t make sense anymore — we’ve got an uncompetitive rate. We tax at 35 percent of income, although we only take about 23 percent. So we should cut the rate to 25 percent, or whatever’s competitive, and eliminate a lot of the deductions so that we still get a fair amount, and there’s not so much variance in what the corporations pay. But how can they do that by Aug. 2?”

Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/07 ... z1RGV8pGei

Sounds like he's actually endorsing raising the corporate rate by 2%.

Or whatever is competitive.

Competetive is not 35% that's for sure.

CriticalBill wrote: Even Bill Clinton thinks the corporate tax rate needs to be lowered to make the US a more competitive place to do business. Will Obama and the other Keyensians take this idea into consideration or will they continue to drive away businesses?
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0711/58275.html

This is common sense, lets see it there is any left in Washington.

They will NOT take it into consideration...or wait, they'll SAY they will, and then cop out.

On another note: [Bill Clinton Accent] "What does a pop machine and Monica Lewinsky have in common? Insert Bill here, hehehe. I don't care who ya are, that's funny."