You wouldn't pause and ask yourself "Why would someone behave that way toward me? What did I do to make them so uncomfortable that they felt the need to leave simply because of my presence?"
Kate wrote: You wouldn't pause and ask yourself "Why would someone behave that way toward me? What did I do to make them so uncomfortable that they felt the need to leave simply because of my presence?"
Nope! I debate with her just like anyone else. I would love to sit with you and have a drink. I have met with archer a couple times and love her as a person and we get along just fine. Heck I have a feeling that outside of here, even VL and I could have a good laugh. LJ has issues, plain and simple. That is her problem not mine.
Kate wrote: You wouldn't pause and ask yourself "Why would someone behave that way toward me? What did I do to make them so uncomfortable that they felt the need to leave simply because of my presence?"
Don't you mean "because of my political views"? Isn't that it in a nutshell? If you compare the posts of both, there is a stark contrast of who is the most nasty and has slung the most insults. I think the wrong person walked out personally.
The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.
Kate wrote: You wouldn't pause and ask yourself "Why would someone behave that way toward me? What did I do to make them so uncomfortable that they felt the need to leave simply because of my presence?"
Don't you mean "because of my political views"? Isn't that it in a nutshell? If you compare the posts of both, there is a stark contrast of who is the most nasty and has slung the most insults. I think the wrong person walked out personally.
Yes but I graduated out of that Jr High mentality decades ago.
Kate wrote: You wouldn't pause and ask yourself "Why would someone behave that way toward me? What did I do to make them so uncomfortable that they felt the need to leave simply because of my presence?"
Don't you mean "because of my political views"? Isn't that it in a nutshell? If you compare the posts of both, there is a stark contrast of who is the most nasty and has slung the most insults. I think the wrong person walked out personally.
From my view, it's Viking that throws the majority of insults. LJ just answers in kind.
Kate wrote: You wouldn't pause and ask yourself "Why would someone behave that way toward me? What did I do to make them so uncomfortable that they felt the need to leave simply because of my presence?"
Nope!
The willingness to reflect on one's behavior is one of the hallmarks of a mentally healthy, well-adjusted person.
Kate wrote: You wouldn't pause and ask yourself "Why would someone behave that way toward me? What did I do to make them so uncomfortable that they felt the need to leave simply because of my presence?"
Nope!
The willingness to reflect on one's behavior is one of the hallmarks of a mentally healthy, well-adjusted person.
'Nuff said?
Yes that is all I said there. :bash :bash Taking quotes totally out of context and only posting the part that suits your case. Typical Liberal tactic. And totally expected and predictable. Birds of a feather.....
Kate wrote: You wouldn't pause and ask yourself "Why would someone behave that way toward me? What did I do to make them so uncomfortable that they felt the need to leave simply because of my presence?"
Nope!
The willingness to reflect on one's behavior is one of the hallmarks of a mentally healthy, well-adjusted person.
'Nuff said?
Yes that is all I said there. :bash :bash Taking quotes totally out of context and only posting the part that suits your case. Typical Liberal tactic. And totally expected and predictable. Birds of a feather.....
Yeah, you said more than just "Nope", you went on to further bash LJ and pile on more self-serving crap about what a great guy you think you are.
Are you actually complaining that I didn't rub your face in ALL of that?
Kate wrote: You wouldn't pause and ask yourself "Why would someone behave that way toward me? What did I do to make them so uncomfortable that they felt the need to leave simply because of my presence?"
Nope!
The willingness to reflect on one's behavior is one of the hallmarks of a mentally healthy, well-adjusted person.
'Nuff said?
Yes that is all I said there. :bash :bash Taking quotes totally out of context and only posting the part that suits your case. Typical Liberal tactic. And totally expected and predictable. Birds of a feather.....
Yeah, you said more than just "Nope", you went on to further bash LJ and pile on more self-serving crap about what a great guy you think you are.
Are you actually complaining that I didn't rub your face in ALL of that?
You are totally delussional! Libs can't help but lie and they totally believe themselves! it is remarkable! Here is what I said to help you out......
Nope! I debate with her just like anyone else. I would love to sit with you and have a drink. I have met with archer a couple times and love her as a person and we get along just fine. Heck I have a feeling that outside of here, even VL and I could have a good laugh. LJ has issues, plain and simple. That is her problem not mine.
Other than the last sentence which is how LJ acts when others who disagree with me are just fine, which part of wanted to meet for a drink and how i get along with many liberals on here, in your fantasyworld is self-serving crap? I just said I would love to meet you. You are paranoid and maybe you really are LJ with another nic?
As has been stated many times, here and elsewhere, all the generalizations about conservatives and liberals are nothing more than b**ls**t. I seriously doubt that we could find one member of 285bound who completely fits the generalization of 'conservative' or 'liberal'. After all, which of those generalizations would you use to decide?
All that the use of those terms does is divide people into 'camps' so that we can argue with each other without paying any attention to what anyone actually says.
There are some posters here who I generally agree with, and some who I generally disagree with. I can't think of a single one who I always agree or disagree with.
LOL, if 285Bound banned or censored anything, I think it should be the use of terms like 'conservative', 'liberal', 'Democrat', or 'Republican'!
I can't even conceive the idea of avoiding someone in person because of what has been posted on a forum.
Experience enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again - Jeanne Pincha-Tulley
Comprehensive is Latin for there is lots of bad stuff in it - Trey Gowdy
