Shootings and a Bombing Today In Oslo

Angry white male...

Soulshiner wrote: Angry white male...

And they are everywhere...

But the most virulent types do tend to come from the religious fundamentalist, anti-government (but only government they don't agree with), anti-foreigner, authoritarian faction of AWMs.

poubelle wrote:

Soulshiner wrote: Angry white male...

And they are everywhere...

But the most virulent types do tend to come from the religious fundamentalist, anti-government (but only government they don't agree with), anti-foreigner, authoritarian faction of AWMs.

And all hippies are men with long hair. By your logic any white male who has any umbrage with the leadership of the nation they live in is a terrorist that posses a real and imminent threat to the population of their nation. That line of "reasoning" doesn't track, there are plenty of white males serving in the military and civil services of the United States that do their jobs every day despite not being happy with the current administration.

That's ok, you keep living your life in your own special bubble where everything you say and do is sunshine and light and everyone else is wrong. As long as you can insulate yourself from reality you will be fine.

otisptoadwater wrote:

poubelle wrote:

Soulshiner wrote: Angry white male...

And they are everywhere...

But the most virulent types do tend to come from the religious fundamentalist, anti-government (but only government they don't agree with), anti-foreigner, authoritarian faction of AWMs.

And all hippies are men with long hair. By your logic any white male who has any umbrage with the leadership of the nation they live in is a terrorist that posses a real and imminent threat to the population of their nation. That line of "reasoning" doesn't track, there are plenty of white males serving in the military and civil services of the United States that do their jobs every day despite not being happy with the current administration.

That's ok, you keep living your life in your own special bubble where everything you say and do is sunshine and light and everyone else is wrong. As long as you can insulate yourself from reality you will be fine.

These comments are response to the earlier posts in this thread that automatically assumed the bombing was from "Radical Muslims", and from the continued rants against the threat that all muslims have in their "jihad".

You can take your comments and change "white male" to "muslims" and see how that fits in to the rants against muslims. It just shows the bigotry that is acceptable to some against certain religions, but when applied against them is unacceptable.

otisptoadwater wrote:

poubelle wrote:

Soulshiner wrote: Angry white male...

And they are everywhere...

But the most virulent types do tend to come from the religious fundamentalist, anti-government (but only government they don't agree with), anti-foreigner, authoritarian faction of AWMs.

And all hippies are men with long hair. By your logic any white male who has any umbrage with the leadership of the nation they live in is a terrorist that posses a real and imminent threat to the population of their nation. That line of "reasoning" doesn't track, there are plenty of white males serving in the military and civil services of the United States that do their jobs every day despite not being happy with the current administration.

That's ok, you keep living your life in your own special bubble where everything you say and do is sunshine and light and everyone else is wrong. As long as you can insulate yourself from reality you will be fine.

I used a whole load of qualifiers in my comment. Did I say that it is only the anti-government (but only government they don't agree with) yahoos that are the faction of AWMs who are most apt to go on a nutter? Reading comprehension is your friend if you know how to do it.

poubelle wrote: Reading comprehension is your friend if you know how to do it.

So is constructing a logical argument that has a basis in facts not opinions. Is that the best you can do? It's not much of a rebuttal. Since we are off on a tangent now, a better grammatical structure for the sentence I quoted above would be "Reading for comprehension and content are easy ways to ensure you understand and comprehend the content of written information, assuming you are capable of reading and comprehending what you have read."

Now back to your flawed logic, not every man with long hair is a hippie. Not every angry white male is a terrorist.

otisptoadwater wrote:

poubelle wrote: Reading comprehension is your friend if you know how to do it.

So is constructing a logical argument that has a basis in facts not opinions. Is that the best you can do? It's not much of a rebuttal. Since we are off on a tangent now, a better grammatical structure for the sentence I quoted above would be "Reading for comprehension and content are easy ways to ensure you understand and comprehend the content of written information, assuming you are capable of reading and comprehending what you have read."

Now back to your flawed logic, not every man with long hair is a hippie. Not every angry white male is a terrorist.

So you can comprende when you choose to, eh? What was I supposed to rebut? My statement and I will state it again for you was:


"But the most virulent types do tend to come from the religious fundamentalist, anti-government (but only government they don't agree with), anti-foreigner, authoritarian faction of AWMs."

I specifically wrote "the most virulent types" that make up the "faction of". Got it? I could easily substitute Angry Islamic Male for the AWM. Except I would think that the AIM has more to be angry about.

You are so right that "not every angry white male is a terrorist" NO FREAKING DUH! Just like not every terrorist is a muslim. What is it with you people and your reading comprehension.

Please, please forgive me for not taking more time to make my posts more easily understood by all the extra-needy types. I am humbled by your eloquence.

Statistics point out there are a higher percentage of male terrorists per capita that are Islamists than white Christian.

Hmmmm... Another "conservative Christian" goes bonkers...

You can hear the surprise in *MY* voice...

LadyJazzer wrote: Hmmmm... Another "conservative Christian" goes bonkers...

You can hear the surprise in *MY* voice...

Like those athiests Adolf Hitler, Mao, and Stalin? They went super bonkers!