- Posts: 789
- Thank you received: 0
Science Chic wrote:
Lionshead2010 wrote: Where are LJ and Archer when you need some righteous indignation?
[ Post details ] Post Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:05 pmDude, 7:05 to 7:06 pm between posts - ya might wanna give 'em a chance to log on, on a Friday night, and type an answer before bashing them. Just sayin...lionshead2010 wrote: Chirp, chirp chirp.
Can you hear the crickets? Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2011 7:06 pm
Oh, and I'm not surprised, this administration has gone after whistleblowers, continued wiretapping and expanding the Patriot Act, etc, etc stomping all over ethical behavior - but I'd wager that other liberals won't be as surprised as you think, we're all pretty disillusioned with Obama's backbone and actions...and many previous presidents' as well - it's been a long downhill slide...
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
They might surprise you...you never know...lionshead2010 wrote: I hear ya SC. Frankly, I'm pretty sure at 7:06 tomorrow night they still will not have responded or will have responded with some bullsh*** excuse. I'm good with it. I just wanted to take this opportunity to point out that the same assh*** who won't buy Cheney's book because of something he allegedly did won't be commenting on those shady deals that appear to be related to Fast and Furious.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Science Chic wrote:
They might surprise you...you never know...lionshead2010 wrote: I hear ya SC. Frankly, I'm pretty sure at 7:06 tomorrow night they still will not have responded or will have responded with some bullsh*** excuse. I'm good with it. I just wanted to take this opportunity to point out that the same assh*** who won't buy Cheney's book because of something he allegedly did won't be commenting on those shady deals that appear to be related to Fast and Furious.
This @$$holewon't be buying Cheney's book either - I have environmental books calling my name that'll raise my blood pressure just as effectively! :rofl :thumbsup:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
lionshead2010 wrote:
Science Chic wrote:
They might surprise you...you never know...lionshead2010 wrote: I hear ya SC. Frankly, I'm pretty sure at 7:06 tomorrow night they still will not have responded or will have responded with some bullsh*** excuse. I'm good with it. I just wanted to take this opportunity to point out that the same assh*** who won't buy Cheney's book because of something he allegedly did won't be commenting on those shady deals that appear to be related to Fast and Furious.
This @$$holewon't be buying Cheney's book either - I have environmental books calling my name that'll raise my blood pressure just as effectively! :rofl :thumbsup:
So you are gonna go with the court of public opinion finding on Cheney as well? And I thought you were a scientist.
Do you think we should try the Obama Administration in the same court? Tried, found guilty and given a sentence based on opinion? It would be the same standard applied to the Bush Administration by my liberal friends. You know, the "progressive" ones.
Progressive: Moving forward; proceeding onward; advancing; evincing progress; increasing; as, progressive motion or course; -- opposed to retrograde. Improving; as, art is in a progressive state.
Sounds like "progress" to me. The witch hunts in Salem were pretty "progressive" too. rofllol
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
lionshead2010 wrote: Well we ALL know those witches were guilty of practicing witchcraft and deserved what they got right.
Fair trial, due process and a proper execution. Very "progressive" it seems.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
No, the witch hunts in Salem were not progressive - they were reactive, based on ignorance and superstition. I'm finding myself increasingly annoyed, actually, at the corruption of the term. Progress is a necessary and inherent part of life; without it, organisms and whole species go extinct. I proudly label myself a "progressive" because I know that how I mean it is vastly different compared to those who use the label generically and condemningly.lionshead2010 wrote: So you are gonna go with the court of public opinion finding on Cheney as well? And I thought you were a scientist. I was. Cheney isn't worth the time and effort to study - he's yesterday's news.
Do you think we should try the Obama Administration in the same court? Tried, found guilty and given a sentence based on opinion? It would be the same standard applied to the Bush Administration by my liberal friends. You know, the "progressive" ones. Sure, public officials are fair game, and I've known several liberals who've spoken openly of their opposition to his actions, and I've cited more than one article detailing his loss of support due to continuing Bush policies.
Progressive: Moving forward; proceeding onward; advancing; evincing progress; increasing; as, progressive motion or course; -- opposed to retrograde. Improving; as, art is in a progressive state.
Sounds like "progress" to me. The witch hunts in Salem were pretty "progressive" too. rofllol
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Topic Author
Vice Lord wrote: oh..are we afraid of the "Mexican Cartels" now?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.