It is too bad if he doesn't (and I agree, I don't think he will). He is one of the few politicians who is willing to do the hard work necessary, and can explain to the people what needs to be done and why. He doesn't need a teleprompter to speak. He is real, and winning re-election isn't his prime concern. Doing what is right is what he wants to do.
IMHO, 2016 will be too late. If we get another 4 yrs of Obama, or 4 yrs of a wimpy rep, we are in deep trouble. We need someone in there willing to do the tough job.
Too bad future generations aren't here to see all the great things we are spending their $$ on!!
I have my issues with Christie but I could have supported him. He'd certainly be an improvement on Perry. If Perry continues to slide perhaps he'll reconsider. Obama would be easy to overturn.
I have my issues with all of them, but to have someone who actually says what he means, and means what he says would be refreshing in the white house. It has been a long time.
Guess my support will lean to Cain now....
Too bad future generations aren't here to see all the great things we are spending their $$ on!!
Christie does seem to have more charisma than the current crop, possibly excepting Cain, and unlike Cain, he does have the political experience. And best of all, he can speak off teleprompter.
We elected a President without executive experience and little legislative experience and America is suffering because of it right now.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
SS109 wrote: We elected a President without executive experience and little legislative experience and America is suffering because of it right now.
So your answer is to elect the head of a pizza chain who has never served in a political office?
I haven't endorsed Cain.
I am liking the 2 outliers right now, Jon Huntsman and Gary Johnson. They both have experience as governors and Huntsman has international diplomatic along with business experience.
Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.
