Christie To Endorse Romney

jmc wrote: A sane Republican? Endorsing a candidate that might win? What a concept. A field of whack jobs, and one phony whore. Good job guys.Now we know that Bush-Obama-and maybe Romney, same old politics as usual. We deserve the leaders we get. The whore will be the R's nominee. The Tea Party made a huge difference.LOL

More biased? Any Republican choice interest you, like Huntsman? If you look at Romney's governing record in Massachussets, he was pretty moderate.

Right now they are playing to the base to get the nomination, but will actually govern more from the center.

Mitt Romney's performance in Republican debate leaves rivals on sidelines

In a debate that was dominated by the economy and short on policy detail, Romney's chief opponent Rick Perry failed to deliver

Mitt Romney consolidated his front-runner status on Tuesday night in the Republican presidential race, overshadowing his rivals in the latest debate which was dominated by the country's faltering economy.

His main rival, the Texas governor Rick Perry, needed a strong performance after seeing his poll ratings drop sharply, the result of doing badly in the previous two debates. But he again failed to deliver.

Republican strategists were scathing about Perry's inability to mount a comeback and his lack of fire. The veteran Alex Castellanos said Perry's team had complained he had been tired in the last debate because of having to stand for so long. This time he had been sitting down but was still lacklustre.

"Next time he is going to have to get a mattress," Castellanos said on CNN of the Texas governor's sleepy performance.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/oc ... ial-debate

SS109 wrote:

jmc wrote: A sane Republican? Endorsing a candidate that might win? What a concept. A field of whack jobs, and one phony whore. Good job guys.Now we know that Bush-Obama-and maybe Romney, same old politics as usual. We deserve the leaders we get. The whore will be the R's nominee. The Tea Party made a huge difference.LOL

More biased? Any Republican choice interest you, like Huntsman? If you look at Romney's governing record in Massachussets, he was pretty moderate.

Right now they are playing to the base to get the nomination, but will actually govern more from the center.

That's exactly why it is always politics as usual. In my lifetime (almost 60 years) I have yet to see a politician do anything but try to win regardless.No matter who wins it is the same.
You partisans are fans not citizens. That is what makes me sick.

jmc wrote:

SS109 wrote:

jmc wrote: A sane Republican? Endorsing a candidate that might win? What a concept. A field of whack jobs, and one phony whore. Good job guys.Now we know that Bush-Obama-and maybe Romney, same old politics as usual. We deserve the leaders we get. The whore will be the R's nominee. The Tea Party made a huge difference.LOL

More biased? Any Republican choice interest you, like Huntsman? If you look at Romney's governing record in Massachussets, he was pretty moderate.

Right now they are playing to the base to get the nomination, but will actually govern more from the center.

That's exactly why it is always politics as usual. In my lifetime (almost 60 years) I have yet to see a politician do anything but try to win regardless.No matter who wins it is the same.
You partisans are fans not citizens. That is what makes me sick.

Are you saying that you are not a partisan? Do you have a twin who posts for you?

CivilBill wrote:

jmc wrote:

SS109 wrote:

jmc wrote: A sane Republican? Endorsing a candidate that might win? What a concept. A field of whack jobs, and one phony whore. Good job guys.Now we know that Bush-Obama-and maybe Romney, same old politics as usual. We deserve the leaders we get. The whore will be the R's nominee. The Tea Party made a huge difference.LOL

More biased? Any Republican choice interest you, like Huntsman? If you look at Romney's governing record in Massachussets, he was pretty moderate.

Right now they are playing to the base to get the nomination, but will actually govern more from the center.

That's exactly why it is always politics as usual. In my lifetime (almost 60 years) I have yet to see a politician do anything but try to win regardless.No matter who wins it is the same.
You partisans are fans not citizens. That is what makes me sick.

Are you saying that you are not a partisan? Do you have a twin who posts for you?

I am an equal "party" hater.

I knew there was one thing I didn't like about Christie.

Occupy White House wrote: I knew there was one thing I didn't like about Christie.

Well shucks, I coulda told you you wouldn't like him....he's his own man, does what he thinks is right, not what the party tells him to....and actually has a heart and a mind, all disqualifiers for GOP candidates.

archer wrote:

Occupy White House wrote: I knew there was one thing I didn't like about Christie.

Well shucks, I coulda told you you wouldn't like him....he's his own man, does what he thinks is right, not what the party tells him to....and actually has a heart and a mind, all disqualifiers for GOP candidates.

You just want Romney because he is the only Republican that CAN'T beat Obama.

Then again I can understand....I walked into a McDonalds today for a cup of coffee and it was like being at a Social Security Retirement Home...nice....

That's the type of retirement socialist want folks to have.... wake up and look forward to spending a few hours and get their $ 1 cup of coffee at McDonalds....darn corporate greed financed by social security.

Occupy White House wrote:

archer wrote:

Occupy White House wrote: I knew there was one thing I didn't like about Christie.

Well shucks, I coulda told you you wouldn't like him....he's his own man, does what he thinks is right, not what the party tells him to....and actually has a heart and a mind, all disqualifiers for GOP candidates.

You just want Romney because he is the only Republican that CAN'T beat Obama.

Personally I don't want any one of them, but would be more interested in Huntsman than Romney....but then we haven't really gotten to know Huntsman in these debates. What is the GOP trying to hide about him?

archer wrote:

Occupy White House wrote:

archer wrote:

Occupy White House wrote: I knew there was one thing I didn't like about Christie.

Well shucks, I coulda told you you wouldn't like him....he's his own man, does what he thinks is right, not what the party tells him to....and actually has a heart and a mind, all disqualifiers for GOP candidates.

You just want Romney because he is the only Republican that CAN'T beat Obama.

Personally I don't want any one of them, but would be more interested in Huntsman than Romney....but then we haven't really gotten to know Huntsman in these debates. What is the GOP trying to hide about him?

Huntsman is a wolf in sheep's clothing....