- Posts: 9276
- Thank you received: 31
neptunechimney wrote:
archer wrote: [yet has not excelled in other areas during the debates.
Yep, that explains his lousy poling.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The Viking wrote: [So you would support someone to run against Obama whose plan may be totally picked apart leaving him with nothing and Obama in for another 4 years? .
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
neptunechimney wrote:
archer wrote: [yet has not excelled in other areas during the debates.
Yep, that explains his lousy poling.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Conservation Voice wrote: Oh wait. I see what you did there. It was sarcasm.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
archer wrote: So let me get this straight....because Cain is polling well, he must have done well in the debates. .... or is he just another "flavor of the month" who has captured the attention of people for a little while? I swear it's hard to keep up with the GOP polls, only Romney seems to be consistent. I guess time will tell if Cain stays on top for any length of time. I have to go with Viking on this one, wouldn't it be better to vet the 999 plan now, rather than have the Democrats do it in the general election? I'm still trying to wrap my mind around the idea that you don't care if the plan is fatally flawed, just get the guy elected and worry about it later.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The Viking wrote:
archer wrote: So let me get this straight....because Cain is polling well, he must have done well in the debates. .... or is he just another "flavor of the month" who has captured the attention of people for a little while? I swear it's hard to keep up with the GOP polls, only Romney seems to be consistent. I guess time will tell if Cain stays on top for any length of time. I have to go with Viking on this one, wouldn't it be better to vet the 999 plan now, rather than have the Democrats do it in the general election? I'm still trying to wrap my mind around the idea that you don't care if the plan is fatally flawed, just get the guy elected and worry about it later.
Can't beleive we are agreeing so much but I don't get that concept either.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.