These are Obama’s Riots!

[youtube:36mwmtcy][/youtube:36mwmtcy]

How cute... Yes, of course, all of the people in OWS are bums that don't want to work...

.....moron....

Maybe if the lower class would act like the Okies in Grapes Of Wrath they would be better off...

The "Have's" and the "Have Not's"

[youtube:3b5vb2s2][/youtube:3b5vb2s2]

LadyJazzer wrote: How cute... Yes, of course, all of the people in OWS are bums that don't want to work...

.....moron....

Do you know the actual statistics on which active protestors at the various Occupy camps wants employment and who wants to live off the dole? Some link to some figures please.

Well, the dialogue from a 60's comedy sure has ME convinced....

Dr Philban wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: How cute... Yes, of course, all of the people in OWS are bums that don't want to work...

.....moron....

Do you know the actual statistics on which active protestors at the various Occupy camps wants employment and who wants to live off the dole? Some link to some figures please.

Hey, it's YOUR fantasy... You want figures, YOU produce them... (FauxNews/NewsMax/ad nauseum, don't count...)

LadyJazzer wrote:

Dr Philban wrote:

LadyJazzer wrote: How cute... Yes, of course, all of the people in OWS are bums that don't want to work...

.....moron....

Do you know the actual statistics on which active protestors at the various Occupy camps wants employment and who wants to live off the dole? Some link to some figures please.

Hey, it's YOUR fantasy... You want figures, YOU produce them... (FauxNews/NewsMax/ad nauseum, don't count...)

You're being dishonest again. Where did I say or even suggest that "all of the people in OWS are bums that don't want to work." Im waiting for a link to my statement. Or are you making stuff up again? (which seems to be the only way you can debate a subject, by making bullsh*t up).

Where is that "sarcasm" font when you need it. You can take "dishonest" and shove it. You'll be waiting until hell freezes over, since it is your assumption that there is a large number of people who fall into your generalization.

It's YOUR fantasy... You want figures, YOU produce them... (FauxNews/NewsMax/ad nauseum, don't count...)

Y'know, Bean-O, you're as obnoxious now as you were before... I think I'm adding you to my list. Have fun.

LadyJazzer wrote: Where is that "sarcasm" font when you need it. You can take "dishonest" and shove it. You'll be waiting until hell freezes over, since it is your assumption that there is a large number of people who fall into your generalization.

It's YOUR fantasy... You want figures, YOU produce them... (FauxNews/NewsMax/ad nauseum, don't count...)

Y'know, Bean-O, you're as obnoxious now as you were before... I think I'm adding you to my list. Have fun.

Like I said earlier, I'm not Bean-o, don't know who he/she is, and I'm not being sarcastic. You claimed I made some all inclusive statement about the employment concerns (or lack of concern) of the Occupy protestors, which I didn't make. And again, what the f**k are you a mind reader? When did I EVER make an assumption or a generalization about the employment status of these protestors? You're a major fail, times over. And you don't even have the gumption or the facts to back up your statements. Maybe you attract people like Bean-o or myself because there's still a small subset of society that bristles at dishonesty. You may play pretty good guitar for a girl (I've seen no proof of that...) but you certainly don't know how to be honest.