Poll: Newt Surges Into First Place

15 Nov 2011 09:35 - 15 Nov 2011 11:15 #41 by FredHayek
Some of those factual errors might have been opinion errors. Historians are always disagreeing about what actually took place.

Anyone else see the South Park History Channel episode? Pretty funny stuff, were aliens at the Pilgrim's first Thanksgiving?

And O' Reilly is willing to correct the errors.

lol I love that show, he puts gauze on the lens for his camera to disguise his age, but everyone else gets to be seen wrinkles and all in HD. More vain. It is like his camera is in a fog compared to everyone else's crisp features.

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2011 10:25 #42 by Wayne Harrison
They weren't "opinion errors." Do a little research on the subject.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2011 12:44 #43 by Pony Soldier

Kate wrote:

neptunechimney wrote:

Conservation Voice wrote:

Here’s how Mother Jones recounted Newt’s hospital visit with Jackie, who was her husband’s former high school math teacher:

Jackie had undergone surgery for cancer of the uterus during the 1978 campaign, a fact Gingrich was not loath to use in conversations or speeches that year. After the separation in 1980, she had to be operated on again, to remove another tumor While she was still in the hospital, according to Howell, “Newt came up there with his yellow legal pad, and he had a list of things on how the divorce was going to be handled. He wanted her to sign it. She was still recovering from surgery, still sort of out of it, and he comes in with a yellow sheet of paper, handwritten, and wants her to sign it.

The source was Lee Howell, a former Gingrich campaign press secretary


http://www.salon.com/2011/03/08/gingric ... al_cancer/


Who are you going to believe, HufPo or their daughter. Chose carefully grasshoppers, the answer says much about who you are.

Apparently, the soon-to-be ex-wife also verifies this story.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newt_Gingrich
(It's from wikipedia, so take it with a grain of salt.)

Gingrich has been married three times. In 1962, he married Jackie Battley, his former high school geometry teacher, when he was 19 years old and she was 26. In the spring of 1980, Gingrich left Battley after having an affair with Marianne Ginther. In 1984, Battley told the Washington Post that the divorce was a "complete surprise" to her. According to Battley, in September 1980, Gingrich and their children visited her while she was in the hospital, recovering from surgery, and Gingrich wanted to discuss the terms of their divorce. Gingrich has disputed that account. In 2011, their daughter, Jackie Gingrich Cushman, said that it was her mother who requested the divorce, that it happened prior to the hospital stay (which was for the removal of a benign tumor, not cancer), and that Gingrich's visit was for the purpose of bringing the couple's children to see their mother, not to discuss the divorce.



Here's another article on the remarkably hypocritical aspect of his life - impeaching a President for lying about an affair, while having an affair.
http://articles.cnn.com/2007-03-09/poli ... M:POLITICS


Have to agree on the hypocritical part, but I have no idea what his wife was like. Maybe she was abusive or something. I try not to judge people based solely on how good or bad they handled a personal relationship.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2011 17:35 #44 by Blazer Bob

Conservation Voice wrote: They weren't "opinion errors." Do a little research on the subject.


Not worth it.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2011 18:29 #45 by Reverend Revelant
Interesting how the socialist deflected the actual topic of this thread. I bet it was **********... wasn't it?

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2011 18:40 #46 by Reverend Revelant
I just want to take a moment to thank all of the Democrats who have engaged in sex scandals over the years http://www.ranker.com/list/democrat-sex ... eb-infoguy These brave men have forge a new era in public awareness of the dynamics of politics, power and sex. Thanks to these pioneering individuals, sexual dalliance is no longer an issue with the American public... which should pave the way for Newt, Cain and others... men who are just men, but men who should be kings.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2011 18:48 #47 by Kate

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: I just want to take a moment to thank all of the Democrats who have engaged in sex scandals over the years http://www.ranker.com/list/democrat-sex ... eb-infoguy These brave men have forge a new era in public awareness of the dynamics of politics, power and sex. Thanks to these pioneering individuals, sexual dalliance is no longer an issue with the American public... which should pave the way for Newt, Cain and others... men who are just men, but men who should be kings.


We should also thank all the Republicans who got caught with their pants down.

http://www.ranker.com/list/republican-s ... eb-infoguy

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2011 18:51 #48 by Wayne Harrison
Only posting one side, while ignoring the other side shows how intellectually dishonest Liberals GOP Twin is. He has been added to my blocked list. I no longer want to read his tripe.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2011 18:52 #49 by LadyJazzer
How special... rofllol :lol: rofllol :lol:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

15 Nov 2011 18:57 #50 by Wayne Harrison
I don't have time to read wankers.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.152 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+