Jeb Bush

He has a peice in the WSJ. I have seen a little speculation that is a precursor or maybe a trail balloon to a run. Others say BS, way too late.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142 ... on_LEADTop


"Have we lost faith in the free-market system of entrepreneurial capitalism? Are we no longer willing to place our trust in the creative chaos unleashed by millions of people pursuing their own best economic interests?

The right to rise does not require a libertarian utopia to exist. Rather, it requires fewer, simpler and more outcome-oriented rules. Rules for which an honest cost-benefit analysis is done before their imposition. Rules that sunset so they can be eliminated or adjusted as conditions change. Rules that have disputes resolved faster and less expensively through arbitration than litigation.

In Washington, D.C., rules are going in the opposite direction. "..............

Jen Bush? That would be cool. Jeb Bush? Still better than most of the Gop options

Yes, the last two Bush's worked out so well, let's try it a third time...

But this one is more compassionate and less conservative. And the economy was better under the Bush's than it is under obama.

That was a good article, maybe Bush would be a good VP choice? Now all we need is a good P choice. LOL

FredHayek wrote: . And the economy was better under the Bush's than it is under obama.

That's kind of like saying it's better to have smallpox than bubonic plague.

"And the economy was better under the Bush's than it is under obama."


That's a lie, and he knows it... And the PROOF has been presented over and over again. His refusal to acknowledge it and continue to stick his head in the sand is tiresome...at best.

AspenValley wrote:

FredHayek wrote: . And the economy was better under the Bush's than it is under obama.

That's kind of like saying it's better to have smallpox than bubonic plague.

:thumbsup: Good point. And then there are a couple other things to consider, how much of the economic woes or successes can be directly traced to the President? And just because you think two family members failed this country, it doesn't mean the third will be a bad choice too. I know too many families where siblings are total opposites.

I don't like dynastic political families. To many "connections" concreted into the mix. I'm done with the Kennedys, the Clintons and yes, the Bushes.

LadyJazzer wrote: "And the economy was better under the Bush's than it is under obama."


That's a lie, and he knows it... And the PROOF has been presented over and over again. His refusal to acknowledge it and continue to stick his head in the sand is tiresome...at best.

8% Unemployment under Obama at best?
Inflation under Obama?
Record amount of Americans on food stamps.
Food banks having to distribute record amounts.
Wealth inequality has increased under the Democrats.

At best economically President Obama has stuck his finger in the dike and saved jobs by mortgaging our future, but what happens when no one will loan
the US any more money?

And the only job growth has been in petrol products which Barack is trying to delay like the Keystone pipeline, making us more dependent on unstable foreign sources.
Can we have a reality check here?