You do not have ....

28 Dec 2011 10:48 #51 by LadyJazzer
Replied by LadyJazzer on topic You do not have ....
Poor baby...Still doesn't understand the meaning of the word "socialist"...

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2011 11:09 #52 by Rick
Replied by Rick on topic You do not have ....

AspenValley wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: My screen name says it all. I'm just throwing back at you, Lady Jazzer, Netdude, Archer, Kate, Vice Lord and the rest of the socialist on this forum the same crap that they throw out to the conservatives here on a daily basis.


This makes no sense to me. Even if I agreed with you that the people you name were acting in some concerted, negative way (and I don't, because I've seen virtually every poster on this forum "go negative" at one time or another, I don't think there is any "socialist" monopoloy on it).

But if I see someone behaving in a way I don't find admirable, the last thing on earth I would do would be to deliberately behave in the same way. It's actually validating behavior you don't agree with, don't you see that?

I agree with you AV. However, while that is the adult" thing to do, it's only half of what really needs to be done if you want too act like a real adult. I've made several attempts to highlight the haters and isolate them so we might be able to have some good discussions that don't get highjacked by the crazies....epic fail. The reason it fails is because nobody is willing to call out those @ssholes on their side. You know there has always been one super nasty poster on each side that fires the first shot and then either gets support or indifference from those on the same side.

I know it's possible because I post on a couple other message boards that are self moderated by adults who act like they are face to face. When someone makes an ignorant blanket statement, they are called out by someone on their side and they either retract the statement or they go away embarrassed. This is not possible here. Even the too most respectful...PS and SC, never call out the ignorant and hateful statements made on their side.

Bottom line is that this place will always be at the level of teenage chat room with a sprinkling of respect but ultimately controlled by the hateful mud slingers. I suppose that is what most of you want, but just look at how rare it is to get a new voice in the mix....nobody outside wants to come in and speak...it's hard enough just to watch.

TLGT won't be successful using that strategy although I respect the attempt. It takes the courage of the more respected posters to embarrass the bottom feeders....IMO, there is very little courage around here.

“We can’t afford four more years of this”

Tim Walz

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2011 11:32 #53 by Reverend Revelant

AspenValley wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: My screen name says it all. I'm just throwing back at you, Lady Jazzer, Netdude, Archer, Kate, Vice Lord and the rest of the socialist on this forum the same crap that they throw out to the conservatives here on a daily basis.


This makes no sense to me. Even if I agreed with you that the people you name were acting in some concerted, negative way (and I don't, because I've seen virtually every poster on this forum "go negative" at one time or another, I don't think there is any "socialist" monopoloy on it).

But if I see someone behaving in a way I don't find admirable, the last thing on earth I would do would be to deliberately behave in the same way. It's actually validating behavior you don't agree with, don't you see that?


I'm highlighting the nasty behavior... don't you see that. And honestly, Lady Jazzer starts every single f'king post with a negative comment. And don't give me any s**t that it's just her opinion or some other fluff over... she's makes nasty an art.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2011 11:55 #54 by Blazer Bob
Replied by Blazer Bob on topic You do not have ....

LLIB wrote: [Bottom line is that this place will always be at the level of teenage chat room with a sprinkling of respect but ultimately controlled by the hateful mud slingers. I suppose that is what most of you want, but just look at how rare it is to get a new voice in the mix....nobody outside wants to come in and speak...it's hard enough just to watch.

TLGT won't be successful using that strategy although I respect the attempt. It takes the courage of the more respected posters to embarrass the bottom feeders....IMO, there is very little courage around here.


LLIB, been there done that, here is one attempt: <!-- l --><a class="postlink-local" href=" 285bound.com/Forums/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=...&hilit=what+is+wrong " onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">viewtopic.php?f=6&t=10563&hilit=what+is+wrong<!-- l -->


Even though I couched it in tactical terms it is pissing into the wind.

My preference is ether moderate even handed moderation or targeted moderation. That is why my home page is SI. If you care to share, I am curious what your adult sites are. WRT politics I come here to play in the sand box.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2011 12:03 #55 by AspenValley
Replied by AspenValley on topic You do not have ....

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: [I'm highlighting the nasty behavior... don't you see that. And honestly, Lady Jazzer starts every single f'king post with a negative comment. And don't give me any s**t that it's just her opinion or some other fluff over... she's makes nasty an art.


Actually, no, I don't "see that". Anyone who has posted here or at the "other place" any length of time (and that includes virtually all the active posters here) knows that some posters are more "barbed" than others. And the "making nasty an art form" appears on both sides.

Personally, I don't have that big a problem with nasty. I have a problem with the inane, with the contentless, with the mindlessly partisan that not only doesn't advance a discussion but fails to see it's own inanity.

I don't see a lot of point in singling out this or that poster as the "offender", let alone playing some elaborate game of mimicking what I imagine is their bad behavior.

It isn't humorous and it isn't even effective. A person would have to be blind not to have already noticed the foibles and failings of most of the posters here.

If you want to improve the quality of the discussion here, call people out on the quality (or lack of) of their viewpoints and arguments. I've seen you do it and you do it rather well. It's much more effective than complaining about someones charateristic response to an argument, which no amount of satirizing is going to change anyway.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2011 14:17 #56 by Reverend Revelant

AspenValley wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote: [I'm highlighting the nasty behavior... don't you see that. And honestly, Lady Jazzer starts every single f'king post with a negative comment. And don't give me any s**t that it's just her opinion or some other fluff over... she's makes nasty an art.


Actually, no, I don't "see that". Anyone who has posted here or at the "other place" any length of time (and that includes virtually all the active posters here) knows that some posters are more "barbed" than others. And the "making nasty an art form" appears on both sides.

Personally, I don't have that big a problem with nasty. I have a problem with the inane, with the contentless, with the mindlessly partisan that not only doesn't advance a discussion but fails to see it's own inanity.

I don't see a lot of point in singling out this or that poster as the "offender", let alone playing some elaborate game of mimicking what I imagine is their bad behavior.

It isn't humorous and it isn't even effective. A person would have to be blind not to have already noticed the foibles and failings of most of the posters here.

If you want to improve the quality of the discussion here, call people out on the quality (or lack of) of their viewpoints and arguments. I've seen you do it and you do it rather well. It's much more effective than complaining about someones charateristic response to an argument, which no amount of satirizing is going to change anyway.


Evidently you are blind.

Lady Jazzer wrote: "Of course, you can take your "general government" jacksonian b.s. and put it in the usual place."
"Insert standard b.s. "general government" screed here: ___________________________________________"
"Yeah, God help us if the Tealigious Tea-liban, TeaVangelicals, Teapidiots, and Teahadists take over..."
"Another neo-con tax-cheat goes down... Typical teabagger. Seems like I remember some bumper-stickers at one time: "Thank you Douglas Bruce -- A True Friend of Liberty"..."
"But I think the entire GOP herd is the funniest thing on the planet..."
"You're as big a liar as Viking...You just use longer sentences and the same silly phrases over and over."
"Yeah, I guess you can thank the petulant teabaggers for forcing the 2-month compromise... It could have been better, so for that very reason they had to throw a tantrum and block it."
"I love it when the teabaggers shoot themselves in the foot, and then cry, "Obama made us do it!!".... Bwaaaaaaaaaaa"
"Of course, since I already know what the "compassionate conservative" sociopaths will say,"
"So, anytime one of the "reptards" starts a sentence with: "So you admit_____________" I know that the b.s. level is approaching the danger level."
"So, I take it no one has an intelligent comment to make about the original post"
"But do let me know if you ever have a relevant comment to make about the article."
"Let us know when you have something REAL to post... (and get your head out of your nether-region...and stop lying.)"
"Yes, I'm sure you are confused... But I'll get over it."


And that's just a sample of the first 4 pages of posts. I sure I could waste a whole evening finding a few hundred more. Your exclamation "Actually, no, I don't "see that". " can be answered with a Lady Jazzer quote... "Yes, I'm sure you are confused... But I'll get over it."

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2011 14:50 #57 by AspenValley
Replied by AspenValley on topic You do not have ....
What I don't see is how you think you are "helping" by "emphasizing" what bothers you about a particular poster.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2011 14:57 #58 by Reverend Revelant

AspenValley wrote: What I don't see is how you think you are "helping" by "emphasizing" what bothers you about a particular poster.


I'm not trying to help anyone or anything. But I will throw back the same kind of trash to LJ, you or anyone who wants to take the tact of being down right nasty like that little list above. It's not for your benefit or anyone else's. As one of the conservatives here, I don't like being trash talked anymore than you like my trash talk... but I'm not going to just sit back and take it. I've been lurking around here long enough before I signed up to realize that this forum has been a liberal hive dedicated to putting down conservative... not just arguing or debating with them... down right putting them down.

So... yap and yelp all you want. Tell me this or that, complain all you want, but I'm not going to let it slide. No way. Get use to it. And if you don't want to deal with it... IGNORE... it's the new "la la la la la la la la... I can't hear you".

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2011 15:04 #59 by AspenValley
Replied by AspenValley on topic You do not have ....
You have a problem with one poster which you've now generalized into a totally false characterization of the entire forum. If you're feeling so "put down" as a conservative, I'd suggest you look into why you are walking around with such a chip on your shoulder, because I just don't see this mass effort to put conservatives down.

Whiny victimhood doesn't become you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

28 Dec 2011 15:15 #60 by Reverend Revelant

AspenValley wrote: You have a problem with one poster which you've now generalized into a totally false characterization of the entire forum. If you're feeling so "put down" as a conservative, I'd suggest you look into why you are walking around with such a chip on your shoulder, because I just don't see this mass effort to put conservatives down.

Whiny victimhood doesn't become you.


I'm not trying to be "becoming" to anyone.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.142 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+