Saw it a few days ago, she looks like a 20-30 y.o. model, not a high school kid. Geez. Guess I am getting old. I guess each school should set their own yearbook guidelines. I dunno. Didn't seem that racy to me.
If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2
Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.
I saw that too, didn't pay much attention (I didn't even notice it was in Durango, d'oh!). The photo didn't look that risqué to me, but I know things that would pass in SF would never fly in Cincinnati, so does the majority mindset of the area play a part? Or did she just piss off the wrong person running the yearbook?
"Now, more than ever, the illusions of division threaten our very existence. We all know the truth: more connects us than separates us. But in times of crisis the wise build bridges, while the foolish build barriers. We must find a way to look after one another as if we were one single tribe.” -King T'Challa, Black Panther
The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it. ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is. ~Winston Churchill
Been years since HS, but the policy was all photos had to be approved by the powers that be.
Seems like Miki is getting what she wants: publicity, and for free, at that.
And, yes, I think it's too suggestive for a HS yearbook. Unless....they have a section on what students are going to be with photos of them. She'd fit into the budding stripper category (and I'm being nice).
rofllol 
