BearMtnHIB wrote: You have avoided the moral question.
Are my girlfriends rights being violated if I marry one and can't legally marry the other 2?
Are my civil rights being violated by only allowing me to marry one of my sweethearts?
Because if a homo man's civil rights are being violated because he can't marry his buddy vince- then why is it not so between me and my girlfriends?
Why are the homo's civil rights more important than my rights- or the rights of my girlfriends?
I haven't avoided anything...I think I've successfully proved that "the moral question" is a load of crap, and historically so... That's my answer to your "moral question."
To answer your question about violations of rights not afforded to same-sex-couples...Should you marry one of your 3 "concubines", here are all the rights that you would get that same-sex couples would not:
BearMtnHIB wrote: You have avoided the moral question.
Are my girlfriends rights being violated if I marry one and can't legally marry the other 2?
Are my civil rights being violated by only allowing me to marry one of my sweethearts?
Because if a homo man's civil rights are being violated because he can't marry his buddy vince- then why is it not so between me and my girlfriends?
Why are the homo's civil rights more important than my rights- or the rights of my girlfriends?
No one owes you anything for your moral positions. Those moral positions are based on all the factors and influences that you have experienced through out your life. They don't belong to anyone else, they are yours and there are other people in this world that don't share your morals.
Hey... according to your own logic... if this law passes, then 3 way civil unions are just around the corner. So if you want to marry more than one of your sweethearts... then support his bill.
You're treading water and sounding sillier and siller every time you post.
All 3 of my girlfriends want to have the benefit of my health insurance- but I can only do one (at a time).
Are my girlfriends civil rights being violated because they all can't get on my insurance. I mean one of my girlfriends is a lawyer, and she has good insurance too- but the other 2 don't have any insurance.
Why is the homo's civil rights being violated- but my 2 girlfriends who are not lawyers - are their civil rights being violated?
Should we file a law suit for violating our civil rights?
BearMtnHIB wrote: All 3 of my girlfriends want to have the benefit of my health insurance- but I can only do one (at a time).
Are my girlfriends civil rights being violated because they all can't get on my insurance. I mean one of my girlfriends is a lawyer, and she has good insurance too- but the other 2 don't have any insurance.
Why is the homo's civil rights being violated- but my 2 girlfriends who are not lawyers - are their civil rights being violated?
Should we file a law suit for violating our civil rights?
Only if you're planning on marrying all three...which would be Romney-style polygamy.
We are talking about rights being denied to committed and/or married couples...And there are specific legal requirements, whether you know it or not, --(obviously not)-- that define whether or not a couple qualifies...And your typical homophobic assumption that it means casual sex-partners is laughably insane...
No one will address the moral dilemma and legal morality of allowing 2 women to marry for civil rights issues - but not allowing my 3 girlfriends to legally marry me?
You are all morally bankrupt- even the "so called" conservative posters here today.
If 2 women can marry legally because their civil rights are being violated- then logic would follow that my civil rights and my girlfriends civil rights are also being violated.
