Born in Kenya? Obama bio raises doubts - again!

18 May 2012 17:53 #31 by JMC

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

jmc wrote: If the original post was even remotely true, why hasn't Fox or some other semi-reputable news organization run with this? Or some of the right wing PACS? Maybe they are saving this new bombshell for later.
Oh right they are afraid of the pinko lefties.


You see... the original post is true... as verified by Miriam Goderich's statement in my post, who was then his literary agent and claims to have wrote this bio and by Miriam Goderich's statement in Lady Jazzer's post (did you even read the whole thread?). And why would you believe Fox any more than the sources already quoted in this thread.

And my main thrust in this thread is as I stated...

There is no way that President Obama did not see, or know about this bio that existed since 1991 and published by his literary agent. Miriam Goderich claims she NEVER received any information by Obama using this sort of language? Then what did she do? Make this up from whole-cloth? Threw a dart at a world globe and it stuck in Kenya? I'm a published author, and I am also a part time professional performer of 40 years. I've written and rewritten dozens of bios that have been placed on my published works or in programs. If an author or performer doesn't have a pre-designed bio, then the agency may write one, but they would never publish it FOR 16 YEARS without having the author (or performer) vet the material. In the real world that doesn't happen... and not for 16 years.

In the least we have another example of pandering to the multi-cultural multi-racial affirmative action mentality of the left (ala Elizabeth Warren "I'm 1/32 Cherokee") where President Obama and/or his literary agent realized that creating an exotic (but untruthful) bio would weave a colorful and interesting backstory for her client.

That must make it true. You still didn't answer my question. Why has no major,reputable news org. picked this "story" up? It would win a Pulitzer.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 May 2012 17:59 #32 by Arlen
Before the liberals dismiss this too quickly, please go to archive.org and take a look for yourself.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070403190001/http://www.dystel.com/clientlist.html#o

This website is not a news organization and is not political. They archive books, media of all sorts, and websites. They are non-political.

This is the most unbiased type of prime source that can be had.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 May 2012 18:00 #33 by Reverend Revelant

jmc wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

jmc wrote: If the original post was even remotely true, why hasn't Fox or some other semi-reputable news organization run with this? Or some of the right wing PACS? Maybe they are saving this new bombshell for later.
Oh right they are afraid of the pinko lefties.


You see... the original post is true... as verified by Miriam Goderich's statement in my post, who was then his literary agent and claims to have wrote this bio and by Miriam Goderich's statement in Lady Jazzer's post (did you even read the whole thread?). And why would you believe Fox any more than the sources already quoted in this thread.

And my main thrust in this thread is as I stated...

There is no way that President Obama did not see, or know about this bio that existed since 1991 and published by his literary agent. Miriam Goderich claims she NEVER received any information by Obama using this sort of language? Then what did she do? Make this up from whole-cloth? Threw a dart at a world globe and it stuck in Kenya? I'm a published author, and I am also a part time professional performer of 40 years. I've written and rewritten dozens of bios that have been placed on my published works or in programs. If an author or performer doesn't have a pre-designed bio, then the agency may write one, but they would never publish it FOR 16 YEARS without having the author (or performer) vet the material. In the real world that doesn't happen... and not for 16 years.

In the least we have another example of pandering to the multi-cultural multi-racial affirmative action mentality of the left (ala Elizabeth Warren "I'm 1/32 Cherokee") where President Obama and/or his literary agent realized that creating an exotic (but untruthful) bio would weave a colorful and interesting backstory for her client.

That must make it true. You still didn't answer my question. Why has no major,reputable news org. picked this "story" up? It would win a Pulitzer.


Breitbart already has the story whether you consider them reputable or not (I don't, but the literary agent has confirmed the story). So it doesn't matter at this point... if anyone may win a Pulitzer, it would be Breitbart (although I doubt it). If you actually read the story at Breitbart, Breitbart is not claiming this story proves a Kenyan birth (for a matter of fact Breitbart was not a "birther" and publicly stated that) but it calls in question Obama's honesty.

If you don't believe the story, doesn't matter, it's true. What do you think, the ex-literary agent is in cahoots with the right?

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 May 2012 18:02 #34 by Reverend Revelant

Arlen wrote: Before the liberals dismiss this too quickly, please go to archive.org and take a look for yourself.
http://web.archive.org/web/20070403190001/http://www.dystel.com/clientlist.html#o

This website is not a news organization and is not political. They archive books, media of all sorts, and websites. They are non-political.

This is the most unbiased type of prime source that can be had.


JMC is not dismissing anything.. he's trying to deflect... change the subject. All of the necessary information to show that this story is absolutely true is presented on this thread, and he knows that. He's so transparent.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 May 2012 18:07 #35 by Arlen
Here is Dystel & Goderich's requirements for consideration for their unsolicited inclusion in their promotional literature:
(Remember Obama submitted his bio "unsolicited")

Submission Requirements

Contrary to popular belief, we like our unsolicited queries to be concise, well-written and well-proofed, and as devoid of gimmicks as possible. Tell us who you are (past writing credits or celebrity status is helpful to know about but not mandatory), what your project is (a summary paragraph is good), and whether you have submitted this project to the entire publishing community already.

In order to get your foot in the door remember that appearances count. We don't like to see handwritten queries with coffee stains on them. We don't like our names misspelled. We don't like a lot of typos in general. We don't like generic "Dear Agent" letters, but we don't like overly chummy greetings, either. Photographs generally don't help - unless you're Jude Law. Plain and simple works best for us. Don't try to convince us that you've written the next GONE WITH THE WIND... we've heard that one before. Let your project speak for itself.

Enclose a cover letter, outline or brief synopsis of the work (with word count if possible), a sample chapter, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for our response. Please type all of your correspondence and double space everything other than the cover letter. E-mail queries are fine, but keep them brief and make sure your cover letter is in the body of the e-mail. We won't open attachments if they come with a blank e-mail. Please be sure to query only one agent at this agency. We will not review queries sent to more than one of us.

Be patient with us. Remember, we get a great many queries every day and we do read them all. This takes time. We will respond to most query letters within a six to eight week period. If you don't hear from us within that time frame, chances are we did not receive yours. Feel free to resend it.

Once we request the full proposal or manuscript, again be patient. Do not call our offices daily trying to ascertain where we are in the process. We will definitely get back to you one way or another. If you do not hear from us within two months' time, you should check in and make sure we've received your materials. If we did not, please resend.

You should know that we are not legally responsible for your materials, even if you did send an SASE. Unfortunately, sometimes accidents happen — either on our end or with the U.S. Post Office. We will try to return everything that belongs to you, but if we fail, please don't take it personally or call and harass our staff. We really do care about everything that is submitted to us and would not deliberately lose or damage it.

Our goal is to make this process as painless as possible, but we do need your help. The above guidelines will make us better able to respond to you in a timely and thoughtful manner. We look forward to hearing from you.


http://web.archive.org/web/20070403185824/http://www.dystel.com/submit.html

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 May 2012 18:15 #36 by Reverend Revelant

Arlen wrote: Here is Dystel & Goderich's requirements for consideration for their unsolicited inclusion in their promotional literature:
(Remember Obama submitted his bio "unsolicited")
http://web.archive.org/web/20070403185824/http://www.dystel.com/submit.html


Arlen

I think you are confused. Obama was an author for this agency. When Miriam Goderich says the bio was unsolicited, she is saying that Obama did not give them the biographic information, she claims she wrote it herself. This document you are quoting above is in regards to prospective authors who would like to be represented by her agency. Obama was already represented by this agency when she claims she wrote the bio.

My contention is that she would never just make up a bio without having it vetted by the author. And this bio appeared for 16 years in various publications and on their website. Obama had to have knowledge of what was said in this bio.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 May 2012 18:20 #37 by Rick

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Arlen wrote: Here is Dystel & Goderich's requirements for consideration for their unsolicited inclusion in their promotional literature:
(Remember Obama submitted his bio "unsolicited")
http://web.archive.org/web/20070403185824/http://www.dystel.com/submit.html


Arlen

I think you are confused. Obama was an author for this agency. When Miriam Goderich says the bio was unsolicited, she is saying that Obama did not give them the biographic information, she claims she wrote it herself. This document you are quoting above is in regards to prospective authors who would like to be represented by her agency. Obama was already represented by this agency when she claims she wrote the bio.

My contention is that she would never just make up a bio without having it vetted by the author. And this bio appeared for 16 years in various publications and on their website. Obama had to have knowledge of what was said in this bio.

But he never heard anything racist after listening to his racist reverend for 20 years...maybe he's just that clueless and never read his own bio.

The left is angry because they are now being judged by the content of their character and not by the color of their skin.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 May 2012 18:24 #38 by Reverend Revelant

CritiKalbILL wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Arlen wrote: Here is Dystel & Goderich's requirements for consideration for their unsolicited inclusion in their promotional literature:
(Remember Obama submitted his bio "unsolicited")
http://web.archive.org/web/20070403185824/http://www.dystel.com/submit.html


Arlen

I think you are confused. Obama was an author for this agency. When Miriam Goderich says the bio was unsolicited, she is saying that Obama did not give them the biographic information, she claims she wrote it herself. This document you are quoting above is in regards to prospective authors who would like to be represented by her agency. Obama was already represented by this agency when she claims she wrote the bio.

My contention is that she would never just make up a bio without having it vetted by the author. And this bio appeared for 16 years in various publications and on their website. Obama had to have knowledge of what was said in this bio.

But he never heard anything racist after listening to his racist reverend for 20 years...maybe he's just that clueless and never read his own bio.


I hope you were being sarcastic. I've had my bio's in numerous entertainment publications, programs, newspapers, flyers and advertisements for about 40 years. I assure you that in all these cases, unless I submitted the material myself, I have had the opportunity to review the material and approve the final version.

Obama knew.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 May 2012 18:24 #39 by Arlen

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Arlen wrote: Here is Dystel & Goderich's requirements for consideration for their unsolicited inclusion in their promotional literature:
(Remember Obama submitted his bio "unsolicited")
http://web.archive.org/web/20070403185824/http://www.dystel.com/submit.html


Arlen

I think you are confused. Obama was an author for this agency. When Miriam Goderich says the bio was unsolicited, she is saying that Obama did not give them the biographic information, she claims she wrote it herself. This document you are quoting above is in regards to prospective authors who would like to be represented by her agency. Obama was already represented by this agency when she claims she wrote the bio.

My contention is that she would never just make up a bio without having it vetted by the author. And this bio appeared for 16 years in various publications and on their website. Obama had to have knowledge of what was said in this bio.

Go back and read it again. They only wrote the bio after Obama submitted his application to be represented by them.

He supplied the information as per their requirements.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

18 May 2012 18:32 #40 by Reverend Revelant

Arlen wrote:

The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:

Arlen wrote: Here is Dystel & Goderich's requirements for consideration for their unsolicited inclusion in their promotional literature:
(Remember Obama submitted his bio "unsolicited")
http://web.archive.org/web/20070403185824/http://www.dystel.com/submit.html


Arlen

I think you are confused. Obama was an author for this agency. When Miriam Goderich says the bio was unsolicited, she is saying that Obama did not give them the biographic information, she claims she wrote it herself. This document you are quoting above is in regards to prospective authors who would like to be represented by her agency. Obama was already represented by this agency when she claims she wrote the bio.

My contention is that she would never just make up a bio without having it vetted by the author. And this bio appeared for 16 years in various publications and on their website. Obama had to have knowledge of what was said in this bio.

Go back and read it again. They only wrote the bio after Obama submitted his application to be represented by them.

He supplied the information as per their requirements.


I'm sorry... you're right... Obama did have to submit that information. Then he himself claimed he was born in Kenya.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.169 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+