- Posts: 14880
- Thank you received: 27
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/19/us/po ... .html?_r=1GOP Congressman Steers Millions In Federal Dollars To Ridiculous Purchase
WASHINGTON — In the 1980s, the military had its infamous $800 toilet seat. Today, it has a $17,000 drip pan.
Thanks to a powerful Kentucky congressman who has steered tens of millions of federal dollars to his district, the Army has bought about $6.5 million worth of the “leakproof” drip pans in the last three years to catch transmission fluid on Black Hawk helicopters. And it might want more from the Kentucky company that makes the pans, even though a similar pan from another company costs a small fraction of the price: about $2,500.
The purchase shows the enduring power of earmarks, even though several scandals have prompted efforts in Congress to rein them in. And at a time when the Pentagon is facing billions of dollars in cutbacks — which include shrinking the Army, trimming back purchases of fighter jets and retiring warships — the eye-catching price tag for a small part has provoked sharp criticism.
The Kentucky company, Phoenix Products, got the job to produce the pans after Representative Harold Rogers, a Republican who is now the chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, added an earmark to a 2009 spending bill. While the earmark came before restrictions were placed on such provisions for for-profit companies, its outlays have continued for the last three years.
The company’s owners are political contributors to the congressman, who has been called the “Prince of Pork” by The Lexington Herald-Leader for his history of delivering federal contracts to donors and others back home.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
archer wrote: I'm pretty sure a Democrat has done it too....which makes it OK for a Republican to do it. I find it interesting that whatever a Republican does is justified by a Democrat having done it first. Can't these Republicans ever think for themselves?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
The Liberals GOP Twin wrote:
archer wrote: I'm pretty sure a Democrat has done it too....which makes it OK for a Republican to do it. I find it interesting that whatever a Republican does is justified by a Democrat having done it first. Can't these Republicans ever think for themselves?
That's rather funny coming from Lady Jazzer's little angle-biting poodle. (insert Lady Jazzer's emoticons here) rofllol rofllol rofllol rofllol rofllol
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
bassolegato wrote: Those are Smurfs, archer.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
I'm pretty sure a Republican has done it before....which makes it OK for a Democrat to do it. I find it interesting that whatever a Democrat does is justified by a Republican having done it first. Can't these Democrats ever think for themselves?archer wrote: I'm pretty sure a Democrat has done it too....which makes it OK for a Republican to do it. I find it interesting that whatever a Republican does is justified by a Democrat having done it first. Can't these Republicans ever think for themselves?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.