It's been breaking news all over MSNBC, liberal blogs, newspapers and even The Wall Street Journal: "Federal spending under Obama at historic lows ... It's clear that Obama has been the most fiscally moderate president we've had in 60 years." There's even a chart!
I'll pause here to give you a moment to mop up the coffee on your keyboard. Good? OK, moving on ...
This shocker led to around-the-clock smirk fests on MSNBC. As with all bogus social science from the left, liberals hide the numbers and proclaim: It's "science"! This is black and white, inarguable, and why do Republicans refuse to believe facts?
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
More of the same from the left, "...your source is wrong because I don't like what it says..."
How about investing some effort in posting information that proves the facts are wrong instead?
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
otisptoadwater wrote: More of the same from the left, "...your source is wrong because I don't like what it says..."
How about investing some effort in posting information that proves the facts are wrong instead?
It's not that I don't like what it says, it's that I've read and heard enough of Coulter to know that she is unreliable. Big difference that I do not expect you to understand.
Her noting that it was Obama's signature at the bottom of the bills for 9 out of the 12 months during fiscal 2009 is unreliable? Her noting that Obama dispersed $200 Billion from TARP that wasn't spent is unreliable? Please elaborate on how they are unreliable allegations that Coulter in these instances Kate.
PrintSmith wrote: Her noting that it was Obama's signature at the bottom of the bills for 9 out of the 12 months during fiscal 2009 is unreliable? Her noting that Obama dispersed $200 Billion from TARP that wasn't spent is unreliable? Please elaborate on how they are unreliable allegations that Coulter in these instances Kate.
PrintSmith, as you already know, nothing you post will keep the lefties from refuting what you have to say, not even the truth. According to the left, the problem with the post is the source, they can't get past the possibility that the Emperor might not have any clothes after all.
I can explain it to you but I can't understand it for you.
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government take care of him; better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges; When the Republic is at its most corrupt the laws are most numerous. - Publius Cornelius Tacitus
