Hotel Replaces Bibles With Kindles

09 Jul 2012 11:27 #11 by LOL
LOL, good Trolling LJ, looks like you caught a few! Fisheys on!

:lol:

If you want to be, press one. If you want not to be, press 2

Republicans are red, democrats are blue, neither of them, gives a flip about you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2012 11:45 #12 by LadyJazzer

Nobody that matters wrote: Of course, everyone knows she's the queen of "They did it first" excuses for moronic behavior.


Nah, I just take my cues and responses from the usual right-wing Kool-Aid drinkers here....

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2012 11:46 #13 by Reverend Revelant

Democracy4Sale wrote:

Nobody that matters wrote: Of course, everyone knows she's the queen of "They did it first" excuses for moronic behavior.


Nah, I just take my cues and responses from the usual right-wing Kool-Aid drinkers here....


Then if that's the reason... then we are in your head... we own you.

Waiting for Armageddon since 33 AD

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2012 11:48 #14 by Something the Dog Said

PrintSmith wrote:

Democracy4Sale wrote: Kindles sound like a LOT better option than the Gideon buy-bulls... (Which I typically throw in the trash as a matter of conscience...)

Just what one would expect from an intolerant, exclusive bigot. Tell us SFB - why do you feel entitled to destroy the property of others simply because you disagree with them and why are you a supporter of destroying books that don't agree with your particular point of view?

Hey, if Gideon was so concerned about his property, then he should not be so careless with leaving them behind.

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2012 11:50 #15 by FredHayek
Would it be OK to steal all the Westwords in the racks if you didn't like what was in that issue?

Thomas Sowell: There are no solutions, just trade-offs.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2012 11:51 #16 by PrintSmith
So you too feel entitled to destroy property belonging to others? What would you say if your car was vandalized while it was in a parking lot while you were taking in a movie - that if you were concerned about your property you shouldn't have left it in the parking lot?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2012 11:57 #17 by Something the Dog Said

PrintSmith wrote: So you too feel entitled to destroy property belonging to others? What would you say if your car was vandalized while it was in a parking lot while you were taking in a movie - that if you were concerned about your property you shouldn't have left it in the parking lot?


Geez, lighten up. Why so vitriolic today?

"Now Rocky Raccoon he fell back in his room
Only to find Gideon's bible
Gideon checked out and he left it no doubt
To help with good Rocky's revival."

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2012 12:02 #18 by LadyJazzer
If it was other's property, and they put a sticker inside that says "Please feel free to take it with you", then it was obviously property that they (Gideon) expected to lose. Get over it. If they're "down -1", something tells me they they intend to replace it.

But, hey, "You've got yours...so, screw 'em", right?

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2012 12:06 #19 by PrintSmith
A bigot's a bigot Dog - regardless of their political ideology and SFB is someone who revels in their bigotry. I view SFB with no more tolerance than I do a Klansman for there is no difference with regards to their character.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

09 Jul 2012 12:44 #20 by Something the Dog Said

PrintSmith wrote: A bigot's a bigot Dog - regardless of their political ideology and SFB is someone who revels in their bigotry. I view SFB with no more tolerance than I do a Klansman for there is no difference with regards to their character.

Why, because she has no tolerance for a document that is used as a basis for her being called an "abomination", and is used as a basis for denying her basic rights? Can the supporters of that document also then be called a bigot as well, since that document is used as a basis for intolerance for others?

"Remember to always be yourself. Unless you can be batman. Then always be batman." Unknown

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.146 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum
sponsors
© My Mountain Town (new)
Google+