Romney: Cayman Accounts Used To 'Avoid Taxes'

Soulshiner wrote: Maybe it is more about his residency in Utah or Massachusetts that he is worried about than his finances. Where he claimed residency, where he voted could be the issue that's holding him back from releasing.

Hmmmmmmm.... Possibly.....

Did Mitt Romney Vote Illegally in Massachusetts?

That's what Fred Karger claims. The fringe Republican presidential candidate filed a complaint with the Massachusetts elections board alleging that when Romney voted in the state in recent years, he was actually living elsewhere. Romney bought a home in La Jolla, California, in 2008 and sold his Massachusetts home the following year, whereupon he registered his voting address as the basement of his son Tagg's house.

If Romney was actually living in his son's basement, that's a whole other can of worms, but he was seen often enough at political events in California that there were rumors he might run for office there, Mother Jones recounts. Karger (who is openly gay and has long disliked Romney for his stances on gay-rights issues) tracked down a fishmonger in Romney's hometown who told him, "They flew the coop." (Did the Romneys leave town because it was a confusing mix of Dickensian London and L.A. noir?)

http://nymag.com/daily/intel/2011/06/di ... gally.html

Keep it up fellas.

"NEW POLLS SHOW BAIN ATTACK HURT… OBAMA"

Blazer Bob wrote: Keep it up fellas.

"NEW POLLS SHOW BAIN ATTACK HURT… OBAMA"

Really? According to Rasmussen, (that Rightie polling source), here is an article only 3 days old:

Rasmussen: Bain Attacks Working

A new poll by Rasmussen strongly suggests that Obama's Bain Capital attacks are working, with Romney's main claim to the nomination - his business experience - no longer a positive for him.

Generally speaking, is Mitt Romney’s track record in business primarily a reason to vote for him or vote against him?

Reason to vote for him 41% (44%)
Reason to vote against him 41% (33%)
Not sure 18% (22%)

Among Independents

Reason to vote for him 40% (48%)
Reason to vote against him 37% (25%)
Not sure 23% (27%)

http://argojournal.blogspot.com/2012/07 ... -mitt.html

Gee, when you can't even get Rasmussen to buy into your drivel (read: crap), you're in trouble....

Something the Dog Said wrote:

Ryt_Rick wrote:

Something the Dog Said wrote:

FredHayek wrote: Most Congressman don't release their tax returns either. Obama release your transcripts!

Why is that you are not demanding Romney release his transcripts? Or is it only black liberals that need to release them?

And since you are demanding records, why not demand the police reports on the car accident in which Mitt was driving where his passenger was killed? Would that not be pertinent as well?

Never miss your chance to insinuate racism.

Don't have to insinuate it. Why are conservatives demanding to see only President Obama's transcripts and not the other candidates? Why just President Obama? Hmm?

Probably has something to do with whether or not Obama claimed to be a citizen of another country during and after his years of attending college. It's looking more and more like Obama himself is the original "birther" who claimed that he was born somewhere other than Hawaii and that he's the reason there's a controversy about it at all. It would seem that the original thought that he was born in Kenya comes from his very own author's biography that was published for 17 years promoting his fictional life story book entitled "Dreams From My Father". An author's biography, it should be noted, that was updated to include his election to the Illinois State Senate and his "dynamic keynote" address at the 2004 Democratic Convention, and later his election to the US Senate, yet curiously the original error regarding his Kenyan birth remained.

The requests for a peek at the original Hawaii records regarding the location of his birth and access to his college applications have nothing to do with his skin color and everything to do with his father being an alien and the fact that Obama was marketed as being born somewhere other than the US for over 17 years until he decided to run for the office of the president - when his author's biography was once again edited to make it appear that his parents were regular folk instead of powerful and well educated people and the error regarding the location of his birth was found and corrected. Was it corrected or was it simply changed the way many of the events in the book that the biography referenced were changed in an attempt to tell the story that Obama wanted to tell?

Regarding the call for the records of the accident in France in which a person was killed, you've obviously been reading the latest hate blogs located in the "progressive" echo chamber and you already know that France only keeps such records for a 10 year period and that there are no police reports on the incident still in existence that are available to be released. You also know that this issue has been raised in the past, most notably when Romney ran for governor of Massachusetts. The left tried the same character assassination ploy then as well, and even the liberal voters of Massachusetts found it to be less than compelling when the attack was leveled the last time around. I don't expect that it will have a different result this time either, but that won't stop the wingnuts from trying to use it in their politics of personal destruction campaign.

Interesting, when the right goes after Obama its an investigation....when the left goes after Romney it's character assassination. Nice to see that the double standard is alive and well here.

The questions regarding Obama's eligibility are constitutional in nature. What is the constitutional issue regarding Romney being behind the wheel when a drunk driver hit the vehicle and one of the passengers in the vehicle Mitt was driving was killed?

PrintSmith wrote: The questions regarding Obama's eligibility are constitutional in nature. What is the constitutional issue regarding Romney being behind the wheel when a drunk driver hit the vehicle and one of the passengers in the vehicle Mitt was driving was killed?

Ah, but the issue regarding the police report on when a passenger being driven by Mitt was killed was in response to a demand for the college transcripts for which I have failed to find a constitutional basis. But you knew that. And of course you also know that the alleged drunk driver was never charged, and actually went on as a high level official in the Catholic church. In fact no one was ever charged. And in fact it was never determined as to who was at fault, or if in fact, mitt was the drunk driver. Certainly the other driver was never charged with drunk driving or causing the accident, and was actually appointed by the catholic church as archbishop of Lille until he retired in 1998. The only one who claimed that the bishop was drunk and caused the death was Romney and his minions. But you knew that.

Dog, PrintSmith makes it a point not to know anything that might disprove his theory.

When you live in the 18th Century, all of that Sovereign Citizen gibberish in your head pushes out everything else that's relevant.

Key words - "for which I have failed to find a constitutional basis." To which I might reply was he lying when he presented himself as one who was born in Kenya for 17 years or is he lying now when he says he was born in Hawaii?